2006
DOI: 10.1130/g22624.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How stable is the Mississippi Delta?

Abstract: Large deltas are commonly believed to exhibit rapid rates of tectonic subsidence, largely due to sediment loading of the lithosphere. As a result, deltaic plains are prone to accelerated relative sea-level rise, coastal erosion, and wetland loss. Hurricane Katrina's devastation testifies to the severe threat that these processes pose to the Mississippi Delta, but the relative role of tectonics versus other mechanisms causing land subsidence remains elusive. Relative sea-level records derived from basal peat ha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
97
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(30 reference statements)
3
97
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The trend of RSL rise as reported here is compatible with longer RSL records that cover much of the Holocene at various localities across the Mississippi delta [Törnqvist et al, 2006]. That recent study inferred negligible tectonic subsidence rates in large sections of the Mississippi delta during the past 8000 years.…”
Section: Unraveling Gulf Coast Relative Sea Level Risesupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The trend of RSL rise as reported here is compatible with longer RSL records that cover much of the Holocene at various localities across the Mississippi delta [Törnqvist et al, 2006]. That recent study inferred negligible tectonic subsidence rates in large sections of the Mississippi delta during the past 8000 years.…”
Section: Unraveling Gulf Coast Relative Sea Level Risesupporting
confidence: 74%
“…3). Salt-marsh proxy records from the Gulf of Mexico (17,18) show stable sea level until AD 1000, followed by rise to a peak at AD 1200. In Connecticut, sea level rose rapidly at AD 1000 (19), although this record may be compromised by sedimentary hiatuses from hurricane erosion (20,21).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches exist that can estimate autocompaction and these need to be explored if a significant relationship is found between depth and accretion rate (Kaye and Barghoorn 1964;Stevenson et al 1986;Pizzuto and Schwendt 1997;Allen 2000). Lastly, for peatforming regions that are known to be tectonically active, an evaluation of the prospects of subsidence or uplift is essential for proper interpretation of the peat record (e.g., Atwater et al 1977;Sawai et al 2002;Tornqvist et al 2004Tornqvist et al , 2006.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%