2020
DOI: 10.1108/bfj-12-2019-0942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How social norms affect alcohol dependence: the mediating role of perceived benefits and alcohol identity

Abstract: PurposeAlthough the association between social norms and alcohol dependence has been noted, how social norms cause alcohol dependence remains unclear. This study thus investigated how social norms affect the perceived benefits of drinking and alcohol identity, which in turn affect alcohol dependence.Design/methodology/approachConvenience sampling was used, and 452 valid questionnaires were collected from alcohol (specifically, beer) consumers over the age of 18; answers were analyzed through structural equatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The parsimonious-fit measures were the parsimonious NFI (PNFI) and parsimonious GFI (PGFI). The PNFI and PGFI were greater than 0.5, which indicated an acceptable model fit (Wang and Liao, 2020). The absolute-fit measures were χ 2 = 247.12, df = 58, χ 2 /df = 4.26, GFI = 0.94, AGFI = 0.91, and RMSEA = 0.071; the incremental-fit measures were CFI = 0.99, NFI = 0.98 and NNFI = 0.98; and the parsimonious-fit measures were PNFI = 0.73 and PGFI = 0.60.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parsimonious-fit measures were the parsimonious NFI (PNFI) and parsimonious GFI (PGFI). The PNFI and PGFI were greater than 0.5, which indicated an acceptable model fit (Wang and Liao, 2020). The absolute-fit measures were χ 2 = 247.12, df = 58, χ 2 /df = 4.26, GFI = 0.94, AGFI = 0.91, and RMSEA = 0.071; the incremental-fit measures were CFI = 0.99, NFI = 0.98 and NNFI = 0.98; and the parsimonious-fit measures were PNFI = 0.73 and PGFI = 0.60.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alcohol advertisements communicate a lifestyle that evokes the possible world of a brand and its values (Costamagna and Beccaria, 2008). In addition, many alcohol advertisements violate industry guidelines by directing the promotion of brands to a very young audience, placing them in specific magazines or social networks, even though the latter are currently used daily by young people around the world, which is why there is a growing need for youth protection tools is growing (Barry et al, 2018;Jernigan et al, 2005;Park et al, 2019;Rhoades and Jernigan, 2012;Rodriguez et al, 2016;Wang and Liao, 2020).…”
Section: Alcohol Advertising Promotion and The Effects On Young Consu...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presumably, reducing the density of these retail outlets has the potential to facilitate change in behavior of community members by altering the socio-spatial contexts leading to alcohol and tobacco use. This likely happens by reducing residents' access and exposure to the products and product-related marketing but also by disrupting the "collective lifestyle" or social practices supportive of use (i.e., social norms about acceptability of use) [7][8][9]. To inform such efforts, a number of studies have examined (1) retail density in relationship to sociospatial demographic predictors of health disparities to better understand where these retail environments cluster [10,11] and (2) the extent to which retail density might be linked to increased consumption of cancer-causing products [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%