2005
DOI: 10.1007/s11187-004-6486-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How SME Uniqueness Affects Capital Structure: Evidence From A 1994–1998 Spanish Data Panel

Abstract: The principal aim of this paper is to test how firm characteristics affect Small and Medium Enterprise (SME) capital structure. We carry out an empirical analysis of panel data of 6482 non-financial Spanish SMEs during the five years period 1994–1998, modelling the leverage ratio as a function of firm specific attributes hypothesized by capital structure theory. Our results suggest that non-debt tax shields and profitability are both negatively related to SME leverage, while size, growth options and asset stru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

52
240
3
15

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 299 publications
(321 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(59 reference statements)
52
240
3
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, this result reveals low information asymmetry and low agency costs between medium family firms and lenders during the crisis, confirming that family firms have low difficulties to obtain external debt finance during the crisis (Crespi & Martí n-Oliver, 2015). Moreover, our finding is consistent with many studies suggesting negative effects of STL and positive of LTL (Michaelas et al, 1999;Sogorb-Mira, 2005;Van der Wijst, N. & Thurik, R., 1993). About current liquidity, our results show that this is the main variable in explaining both short-term debt and total debt.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, this result reveals low information asymmetry and low agency costs between medium family firms and lenders during the crisis, confirming that family firms have low difficulties to obtain external debt finance during the crisis (Crespi & Martí n-Oliver, 2015). Moreover, our finding is consistent with many studies suggesting negative effects of STL and positive of LTL (Michaelas et al, 1999;Sogorb-Mira, 2005;Van der Wijst, N. & Thurik, R., 1993). About current liquidity, our results show that this is the main variable in explaining both short-term debt and total debt.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Also for firm size (measured by the number of employees), our results show a negative effect on short-term leverage and a positive effect on total debt as empirically demonstrated by several previous studies (e.g. Hall et al, 2004;Micheales, 1999;Sogorb-Mira, 2005). On the contrary, if firm size is measured by sales, its effect on the short-term leverage is positive during the crisis whereas before the crisis it is not significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…From the perspective of accounting and financial statement analysis, working capital is defined as the firm"s short-term or current assets and current liabilities (Arnold, 2008;Jeng-Ren et al, 2006). On the other hand, from a financing perspective, working capital refers to the firm"s investment in two types of assets, a firm"s investment in short-term (current) assets needed to operate over a normal business cycle, and a company"s investments in overall non-fixed assets that are not often measured on the balance sheet such as investment in product redesign or formulation of a new marketing strategy (Bevan & Danbolt, 2002;Sogorb-Mira, 2005). This study focuses on the accounting and financial statement analysis perspective of WC, which focuses on current assets and current liabilities measured on the balance sheet.…”
Section: Concept Of Working Capital Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Profitability increases the internal resources of the company and therefore reduces reliance on external debt. This is also confirmed for small firms (Rajan & Zingales, 1995;Cassar & Holmes, 2003;Ziane, 2004;Sogorb-Mira, 2005, Vos et al, 2007Psillaki & Daskalakis, 2008;Mateev et al, 2013). To verify the existence of a hierarchy of financing, De Haan and Hinloopen (2003) test the following two hypotheses:…”
Section: H6: There Is a Positive Relationship Between Commercial Debtmentioning
confidence: 79%