2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2329099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How has Decentralized Democracy Impacted on the Socioeconomic Well-Being of Workers and the General Public in Indonesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because the social context of the urban community demands a simpler, faster, and service-oriented bureaucracy for their affairs. This affects the public reception upon the municipal government to be consumeristic towards public services where public participation is only reasoned under satisfaction rating (Jameaba, 2013). This consumeristic culture does not imply any expectation which the Village Act stipulated as to public participation in a direct democracy.…”
Section: The Socio-legal Problems Of the New Bill On Lpmk And Its Impmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the social context of the urban community demands a simpler, faster, and service-oriented bureaucracy for their affairs. This affects the public reception upon the municipal government to be consumeristic towards public services where public participation is only reasoned under satisfaction rating (Jameaba, 2013). This consumeristic culture does not imply any expectation which the Village Act stipulated as to public participation in a direct democracy.…”
Section: The Socio-legal Problems Of the New Bill On Lpmk And Its Impmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, the state granted multi-faceted autonomy powers to provinces and districts with the former has higher authority than the latter. The decentralization mandates the central government to allocate some powers to regional governments as to take a decision and legislating statutes specifically addressed and applied in accordance with each own province and district [1]. Whereas the central government would only retain powers in the field of monetary matters, defense, foreign affairs, justice and religion [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%