How green is your packaging—A comparative international study of cues consumers use to recognize environmentally friendly packaging

Abstract

Consumers have grown increasingly aware of the impact of packaging on the environment. Therefore, interest has grown in more environmentally friendly packaging, but we wondered how consumers recognize ‘green’ as distinct from ‘grey’ when evaluating packaging. We asked over 3,000 respondents from Germany, France and the United States how they recognize environmentally friendly packaging. To solicit responses that we may not have anticipated, we used an open‐ended format, which we then followed with a closed‐ended format so that we could compare the two sets of responses. Not surprisingly, in both sets of responses, we found labelling to be the attribute consumers rely upon most, as well as evidence of misleading labels. We also found consumers in Germany and the United States relied on information on the packaging and named searching for information as one of their preferred ways to decide whether packaging is environmentally friendly. French consumers seemed less trusting of published information and more trusting of the look and feel, especially the material, of the package. Our results point to the importance of cultural influences in the acquisition of perceptual cues by the consumer.

50 Shades of Green: Insights into Personal Values and Worldviews as Drivers of Green Purchasing Intention, Behaviour, and Experience

“…Fourth, several studies have indicated that the perceived inconvenience of purchasing green may also play a role in determining green consumer patterns (e.g., [13]). There may be practical reasons that withhold consumers from purchasing green, such as the belief that green products are expensive and difficult to find [70]. Future replications of our study may want to add the perceived inconvenience of purchasing green as a control variable.…”

The influence mechanism of environmental anxiety on pro‐environmental behaviour: The role of self‐discrepancy

“…(Albloushy & Connell, 2019; Gifford & Nilsson, 2014; Graham‐Rowe, Jessop, & Sparks, 2019; He, Duan, Wang, & Fu, 2019; Kautish, Paul, & Sharma, 2019; Kim & Seock, 2019; Paul, Modi, & Patel, 2016). Situational factors include interpersonal relationships, laws, the convenience of recycling facilities, green product quality and green product packaging (Herbes, Beuthner, & Ramme, 2020; Rana & Paul, 2020). In the relationship between situational factors and psychological factors, situational factors were aiming to stimulate consumers’ change of their psychological factors and produce PEBI (Guagnano, Stern, & Dietz, 1995; Steg & Vlek, 2009).…”

Pro‐environmental millennial consumers' responses to the fur conundrum of luxury brands

“…In a cross-cultural study conducted by Herbes et al (2020), Environmentally friendly packaging labels tend to be the primary cue for customers to surmise environmentally ethical merit. Thus, the information cue of a luxury brand's animal fur (vs. faux) stance through a brand description should greatly influence consumers' negative thoughts of that brand and cause greater dissonance.…”