2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2012.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How do bank competition, regulation, and institutions shape the real effect of banking crises? International evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Economic and Monetary Conditions.- Table 2 reports for the baseline linear probability model the estimated coefficients, in a second column the standard errors that are clustered at the bank-month level, i.e., the level at which the interaction terms-which are the main focus of our analysis-vary (see Moulton 1986 for example), 14 followed in a third column by the corresponding significance levels. We start analyzing the direct effects of monetary and economic conditions on the probability that the LOAN APPLICATION IS GRANTED.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Economic and Monetary Conditions.- Table 2 reports for the baseline linear probability model the estimated coefficients, in a second column the standard errors that are clustered at the bank-month level, i.e., the level at which the interaction terms-which are the main focus of our analysis-vary (see Moulton 1986 for example), 14 followed in a third column by the corresponding significance levels. We start analyzing the direct effects of monetary and economic conditions on the probability that the LOAN APPLICATION IS GRANTED.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Pit, refers to price of total assets of bank i at time t, proxied by the ratio of total revenue to total assets; and MCi,t refers to the marginal cost of bank i at time t. We cannot directly observe marginal cost; hence, we follow the extant literature (e.g., Fernández et al, 2013;Beck et al, 2013) and derive it from a translog cost function (TCF) as in Eq. (6) below : 3 3 3 2 , 1 , 2 , , , , , , , , 1 1 1 3 , , , , 1 ln ln ln ln ln ln ln…”
Section: Measurements Of Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While in some countries the efficiency of banking increased with appearance of foreign bank capital (Czech Republic, Croatia, Slovenia), in others it did not undergo significant changes (Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Hungary), or even led to the deterioration of the financial performance of banks (Estonia, Bulgaria, Romania) (Kuznyetsova et al, 2007;Yershov, 2005). Some scientists claim that banks with foreign capital are more efficient than state banks of countries and banks with private national capitals (Fernandez et al, 2010;Bonin et al, 2004). Assessment of the efficiency of foreign bank performance in Poland, made by Havrylchuk (2006), testified to increased efficiency of activity of only newly setup banks with foreign capital, while functioning Polish banks acquired by foreign investors did not show any significant changes in their performance (Havrylchuk, 2006), or even, according to some estimates, showed some performance deterioration (Yershov, 2005).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…= 46.028; F tabl. = 9.15 R = 0.98409323; R 2 = 0.96843949; p = 0.00012 6 Money supply, UAH mln (у 6 ) F( 7, 3 ) calc. = 22140.0; F tabl.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%