2009
DOI: 10.1108/17505930910945723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How consumers value online personalization: a longitudinal experiment

Abstract: PurposeThe ability to acquire and process consumer information online has provided web‐based vendors with the ability to personalize their merchandising at a very low cost. However, empirically establishing the expected positive effect of personalized merchandising has been difficult for practical as well as financial reasons. The aim of this paper is to compare the effectiveness of personalized vs random merchandising on consumers' attitudes and behaviors.Design/methodology/approachA longitudinal subject expe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have shown that personalized recommendations have a significant role in influencing consumer decision-making [68,69]. Personalized recommendations are more easily accepted by consumers than non-personalized re-suggestions (i.e., recommendations generated without regard to consumer preferences) [70], resulting in more clicks than random recommendations [71], and having higher user ratings than random recommendations [72]. In mobile commerce, they also bring a significant increase in pageviews/sales and total sales [73].…”
Section: Personalized Recommendation Cues and Consumer-perceived Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have shown that personalized recommendations have a significant role in influencing consumer decision-making [68,69]. Personalized recommendations are more easily accepted by consumers than non-personalized re-suggestions (i.e., recommendations generated without regard to consumer preferences) [70], resulting in more clicks than random recommendations [71], and having higher user ratings than random recommendations [72]. In mobile commerce, they also bring a significant increase in pageviews/sales and total sales [73].…”
Section: Personalized Recommendation Cues and Consumer-perceived Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies that focus on online store functionality evaluate online stores from the perspective of convenience [17,21,108,144,150,154,159,160], customization [17,161,162,163,164], technical adequacy [77,144,165], usability [166,167,168], interactivity [12,17,69,169,170], fulfillment [87,171], efficiency [171], complexity [172], navigation [147] and transaction speed [150,160] and education and entertainmentfocused in-store events [173]. It was found that when consumers find the online transaction completion process as inconvenient, they are more likely to abandon the online shopping cart [160].…”
Section: Online Vendor / Store Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These items are included in Table I. The Chen and Wells scale has been used in several studies either as originally written (Chiagouris et al, 2008;McMillan et al, 2003) or in a modified format (Ko et al, 2005;Lee et al, 2004;Oyedele and Minor, 2011;Pechpeyrou, 2009). As part of their research effort, Chen and Wells (1999) concluded that three factors were useful predictors of A ST .…”
Section: Evaluating Measures Of Attitudementioning
confidence: 99%