2019
DOI: 10.1029/2018gl080383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Accurately Should We Model Ice Shelf Melt Rates?

Abstract: Assessment of ocean‐forced ice sheet loss requires that ocean models be able to represent sub‐ice shelf melt rates. However, spatial accuracy of modeled melt is not well investigated, and neither is the level of accuracy required to assess ice sheet loss. Focusing on a fast‐thinning region of West Antarctica, we calculate spatially resolved ice‐shelf melt from satellite altimetry and compare against results from an ocean model with varying representations of cavity geometry and ocean physics. Then, we use an i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

5
127
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
5
127
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous modeling studies have demonstrated that ice shelf basal melting is a critical factor in driving ice sheet retreat (e.g. Arthern & Williams, ; Cornford et al, ; DeConto & Pollard, ; Favier et al, ; Goldberg et al, ; Joughin et al, ), with basal melting near the grounding zone and in the new sub‐ice shelf cavities created as melting ice shelves go afloat being particularly important (Arthern & Williams, ; Reese et al, ; R. T. Walker et al, ). Thus, realistic representations of the magnitude and distribution of ice shelf basal melting in global climate models is essential for forecasting 21st century sea level rise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Numerous modeling studies have demonstrated that ice shelf basal melting is a critical factor in driving ice sheet retreat (e.g. Arthern & Williams, ; Cornford et al, ; DeConto & Pollard, ; Favier et al, ; Goldberg et al, ; Joughin et al, ), with basal melting near the grounding zone and in the new sub‐ice shelf cavities created as melting ice shelves go afloat being particularly important (Arthern & Williams, ; Reese et al, ; R. T. Walker et al, ). Thus, realistic representations of the magnitude and distribution of ice shelf basal melting in global climate models is essential for forecasting 21st century sea level rise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous modeling studies have demonstrated that ice shelf basal melting is a critical factor in driving ice sheet retreat (e.g. Arthern & Williams, 2017;Cornford et al, 2015;DeConto & Pollard, 2016;Favier et al, 2014;Goldberg et al, 2019;Joughin et al, 2014), with basal melting near the grounding zone and in the new sub-ice shelf cavities created as melting ice shelves go afloat being particularly important (Arthern & Williams, 2017;Reese et al, 2018;R. T. Walker et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ocean tides also affect sub–ice shelf ocean currents, ocean mixing, and, consequently, ice shelf basal melting (Gwyther et al, ; Jourdain et al, ; MacAyeal, ; Makinson & Nicholls, ; Makinson, ; Makinson et al, ; Mueller et al, , ). Excess basal melting can result in ice shelf thinning that reduces the back stress on ice flow (i.e., reduces “buttressing”), causing increases in ice flow speed (Dupont & Alley, ; Goldberg et al, ; Pritchard et al, ; Reese et al, ). Additionally, coupled ice sheet and ocean models that fail to capture the tidal contribution to basal melting may incorrectly tune parameterizations of basal melting, modifying the sensitivity of basal melting to future ocean conditions (Dinniman et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ice sheet dynamics are highly sensitive to reduced buttressing caused by increased melting near the grounding line, the location where the ice shelf first goes afloat (Goldberg et al, ; Reese et al, ; Seroussi & Morlighem, ). Below most of the area of large ice shelves, tidal currents that contribute to melting can be evaluated from an ocean model that assumes that the ice shelf is in local hydrostatic equilibrium (Padman et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have highlighted a lack of sub‐ice‐shelf bathymetry as a “major limitation” (Pattyn et al, 2017) for future projections of Antarctic mass balance. Improved bathymetric mapping allows determination of water access pathways and calculation of spatially and temporally variable melt rates (e.g., Cochran et al, 2014; Goldberg et al, 2019; Milillo et al, 2019; Morlighem et al, 2020; Pattyn et al, 2017; Tinto et al, 2019). In addition, sub‐ice‐shelf bathymetry also provides information about ice dynamic history.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%