Housing stability and the residential context of the COVID-19 pandemic

Jones, Antwan; Grigsby-Toussaint, Diana S.

doi:10.1080/23748834.2020.1785164

Cited by 64 publications

(60 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In their case study, Kylili et al provides the implications of remote working from homes in European smart cities (Kylili et al 2020). Jones and Grigsby identify the socioeconomic effects of US residents affected by COVID-19 (Jones and Grigsby-Toussaint 2020). Honey-Roses et al discuss the aftereffects of the COVID-19 pandemic on society from a public spaces point of view (Honey-Roses et al 2020).…”

Section: Motivation and Significance Of The Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analyzing energy consumption factors during coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic outbreak: a case study of residential society

Qarnain

2020

Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmenta

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The global pandemic of COVID-19 has affected most countries and has impacted every household's operations. Mandatory stay-at-home lockdowns have forced building residents to use more energy for their daily routine activities, giving rise to higher energy usage. The increased energy use by building residents results in high energy bills and leads to a scarcity in the energy supply. Identifying factors that can control the high energy consumption in buildings can be used to optimize energy consumption and act as energy conservation factors. This proposed research is conducted to identify and explore the most influential energy consumption factors amid COVID-19 pandemic in residential buildings using a case study in India. To analyze the energy consumption factors, a Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methodology based Best Worst Method (BWM) and a Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) methodology have been integrated. The results show that among 34 comprehensive energy consumption factors, the high priority topmost 50% of the factors were analyzed. The main research outcome indicates that 53% of the factors were in the cause group and the remaining 47% were in the effect group factors. Research results conclude that in response to COVID-19, social distancing, home quarantine, and home transformation were the primary factors for energy consumption in homes. Among the sub-factors, the lockdown of streets, shutdown of public markets, and psychological factors were the top three factors adding to increased energy consumption. Further, Industrial and economic importance of the research is also discussed.

show abstract

Section: Motivation and Significance Of The Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analyzing energy consumption factors during coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic outbreak: a case study of residential society

Qarnain

2020

Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmenta

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Implementation of an improved SNS was also particularly timely given the documented exacerbation of the COVID-19 pandemic on economic and health disparities which increased patients’ needs beyond healthcare. 4 , 5 We hope to continue improving our understanding of our patients’ social needs. In order to ensure the SNS is meeting patient needs accurately and adequately, we are also piloting a study examining patient and community perspectives on the SNS.…”

Section: Assessment Of Operational Innovations To Datementioning

confidence: 99%

The COVID-19 Pandemic as an Opportunity for Operational Innovation at 2 Student-Run Free Clinics

Colón

Mulaney

Reed

et al. 2021

J Prim Care Community Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent county shelter-in-place order forced the Cardinal Free Clinics (CFCs), Stanford University’s 2 student-run free clinics, to close in March 2020. As student-run free clinics adhering to university-guided COVID policies, we have not been able to see patients in person since March of 2020. However, the closure of our in-person operations provided our student management team with an opportunity to innovate. In consultation with Stanford’s Telehealth team and educators, we rapidly developed a telehealth clinic model for our patients. We adapted available telehealth guidelines to meet our patient care needs and educational objectives, which manifested in 3 key innovations: reconfigured clinic operations, an evidence-based social needs screen to more effectively assess and address social needs alongside medical needs, and a new telehealth training module for student volunteers. After 6 months of piloting our telehealth services, we believe that these changes have made our services and operations more robust and provided benefit to both our patients and volunteers. Despite an uncertain and evolving public health landscape, we are confident that these developments will strengthen the future operations of the CFCs.

show abstract

“…The COVID-19 lockdown has brought about the emergence of specific push-and-pull factors, which are generally different to the triggers of mobility in a context of 'normality' (Jones and Grigsby-Toussaint 2020). To cite but a few, pandemic-related triggers include loneliness and psychological problems derived from the situation (Devaraj and Parel 2020); difficulties related to forced coexistence with other members of the household (Rogers and Power 2020); and unemployment or other economic problems arising from the paralysis of the national economy (Conde-Ruiz 2020).…”

Section: Reframing Residential Mobility In a Pandemic Contextmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Studies based on information from mobile devices provided by the primary telecom companies have shown the effectiveness of lockdown policies in reducing the daily mobility of the population (Askitas et al 2020;Galeazzi et al 2020;Santamaria et al 2020). However, the current literature about the effects of lockdowns on changes of residence is scarce (at this time only one short study of the subject appears to have been published; Jones and Grigsby-Toussaint 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Customarily, residential mobility is explained through life course changes (Coulter et al 2016) or triggering events related to family, work and housing. However, in the present exceptional situation, 'lockdown mobility' responds to different triggers: economic problems caused by COVID-19, feelings of fear and loneliness or problems related to cohabitation that has become unbearable due to confinement (Jones and Grigsby-Toussaint 2020). Third, according to the context and time, this phenomenon can be illegal in part, as it operates under the radar of official data sources that may, therefore, remain unaware of these changes of residence.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Lockdown and adaptation: residential mobility in Spain during the COVID-19 crisis

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Housing stability and the residential context of the COVID-19 pandemic

Cited by 64 publications

References 4 publications

Analyzing energy consumption factors during coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic outbreak: a case study of residential society

Analyzing energy consumption factors during coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic outbreak: a case study of residential society

The COVID-19 Pandemic as an Opportunity for Operational Innovation at 2 Student-Run Free Clinics

Lockdown and adaptation: residential mobility in Spain during the COVID-19 crisis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About