Histories of Social Psychology in Europe and North America, as Seen from Research Topics in Two Key Journals

Rizzoli, Valentina

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-97064-6_4

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The software IRAMUTEQ version 0.7 alpha 2 (Interface de R pour les Analyzes Multidimensionnelles de Textes et de Questionnaires) was utilized to analyze the articles' abstracts as done by other authors (e.g., Dufour, Rodríguez-González and Laslier (2019) and Rizzoli (2018)). IRAMUTEQ is a free software anchored in R software and Python that allows different types of analysis and generates easily understandable graphics.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…IRAMUTEQ is a free software anchored in R software and Python that allows different types of analysis and generates easily understandable graphics. Although we analyzed fewer abstracts than other studies (Dufour et al, 2019;Rizzoli, 2018), it was more than twice the minimum recommended amount of 20 to 30 texts (Camargo & Justo, n.d.). In addition, for efficient text classification, there must be retention of text fragments above 75% (Camargo & Justo, n.d.).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

An institutional perspective in the industry 4.0 scenario: A systematic literature review

Fogaça

Grijalvo

Neto

2022

JIEM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: The growing adoption of Industry 4.0 offers opportunities and promotes changes in markets, business models, supply chains and operations. However, adopting new technologies and practices is beyond the simple rational decision and the search for efficiency. There are contextual social and cultural systems that influence the behavior of people and organizations. Hence, institutional theory can yield interesting insights in the study of Industry 4.0. The purpose of this article is to examine how and to what extent institutional theory has been used to explain Industry 4.0.Design/methodology/approach: A systematic literature review of Industry 4.0 and the broader field of digitalization was performed using Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar. The authors analyzed the results using multivariate techniques (Descending Hierarchical Classification and Correspondence Factor Analysis) with the aid of the IRAMUTEQ software.Findings: Results indicate there is little research that uses an institutional perspective to investigate Industry 4.0. Most of them are quantitative and are based on the concept of institutional isomorphism. Qualitative studies, e.g., case studies and the use of theories such as institutional logics and institutional work could generate a richer comprehension of Industry 4.0. Besides, consideration of meso (e.g., organizational fields) and macro (e.g., countries) level of analysis should be more extensively explored.Originality/value: This paper identifies research gaps and points to relevant issues frequently not considered by researchers and practitioners. It reinforces a call for an institutional perspective where the concept of Industry 4.0 can be understood as a rationalized myth. Therefore, the meaning, practices, and consequences of Industry 4.0 implementation are expected to vary across organizations and countries.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

An institutional perspective in the industry 4.0 scenario: A systematic literature review

Fogaça

Grijalvo

Neto

2022

JIEM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Change Seen Through the Lens of Social Psychology in Europe and the United States

Rizzoli¹,

Tuzzi²,

Contarello³

2022

Embracing Change

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this chapter, the authors consider the theme both by browsing through seminal reference books and scholars’ contributions and by using digital methods, probing all the abstracts published in two key journals: the US Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and the European Journal of Social Psychology. The keyword change is explored in its frequency, concordances, and usage contexts and trends over time in the two journals. The results empirically support Marková’s claim that change has mostly been studied in social psychology as perturbation of patterns of stability and has focused on individuals as surrounded and affected by social contexts. To better understand and foster societal changes, a “more social” social psychology would be helpful, particularly adopting study designs and projects oriented by perspectives that can emphasize the mutual and constitutive relations between the individual and the social.

show abstract

Histories of Social Psychology in Europe and North America, as Seen from Research Topics in Two Key Journals

Cited by 2 publications

References 15 publications

An institutional perspective in the industry 4.0 scenario: A systematic literature review

An institutional perspective in the industry 4.0 scenario: A systematic literature review

Change Seen Through the Lens of Social Psychology in Europe and the United States

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About