2006 International Electron Devices Meeting 2006
DOI: 10.1109/iedm.2006.346900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly Manufacturable 32Gb Multi -- Level NAND Flash Memory with 0.0098 &amp;#x003BC;m<sup>2</sup> Cell Size using TANOS(Si - Oxide - Al2O3 - TaN) Cell Technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
42
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Though there is a strong dependence on the position of the SiON interface layer, the erase state V FB shows negligible degradation for Si + /N + = 4/4 and 6/2 (nm) bi-layer device. This is in stark contrast to the single layer nitride endurance results in this study as well as in the literature [3], [6], [7], [16], [17] and consistent with recent results on NAN stacks [8] cycling endurance is worth a mention as the improvement is inexplicable by attribution to simply the ratio of Si + vs. N + nitride layer thickness in the bi-layer stack (as plausible in the case of W/E or retention performance). The signature effect of the SiON barrier layer explains the improvement for the bi-layer endurance as single layer nitride endurance is poor -regardless of the choice of nitride composition.…”
Section: Methodscontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Though there is a strong dependence on the position of the SiON interface layer, the erase state V FB shows negligible degradation for Si + /N + = 4/4 and 6/2 (nm) bi-layer device. This is in stark contrast to the single layer nitride endurance results in this study as well as in the literature [3], [6], [7], [16], [17] and consistent with recent results on NAN stacks [8] cycling endurance is worth a mention as the improvement is inexplicable by attribution to simply the ratio of Si + vs. N + nitride layer thickness in the bi-layer stack (as plausible in the case of W/E or retention performance). The signature effect of the SiON barrier layer explains the improvement for the bi-layer endurance as single layer nitride endurance is poor -regardless of the choice of nitride composition.…”
Section: Methodscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…It has been shown that Conventional Floating Gate (FG) Flash is difficult to scale beyond the 3X node due to cell to cell interference, loss of Control Gate to FG coupling, reduction in FG volume (hence the number of electrons stored per bit) [2] and the inability to scale the tunnel oxide thickness below about 7-8nm [1]. Of all the possible alternatives, Charge Trap Flash (CTF) [3] is an attractive candidate as it exhibits negligible cell to cell interference, planar structure hence better scalability and fully CMOS compatible fabrication process. However, CTF suffers from conflicting trends in memory window versus data retention and needs careful attention before becoming a viable technology option.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, however, the NAND Flash memory industry has faced the scaling limitation of the conventional floating gate (FG) NAND cell. For a promising solution as the alternative technology to replace FG flash memory, the charge trap type flash memory, like Silicon-Oxide-Nitride-Oxide-Silicon (SONOS) device has been focused since it provides simpler process steps than FG [3], lower cell-to-cell coupling [4], and virtual immunity to stress-induced leakage current (SILC) [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term "localized" implies the charge storage in discrete storage nodes (Si 3 N 4 bulk traps in CTF and Fermi level of metal in NC) which are electrically isolated from each other. Ease of integration is the biggest factor in favor of the CTF devices [13]. So far, reported CTF devices have shown good memory window but poor retention [9]- [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%