2013 IEEE Topical Conference on Wireless Sensors and Sensor Networks (WiSNet) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/wisnet.2013.6488620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly accurate noncontact water level monitoring using continuous-wave Doppler radar

Abstract: A novel water level monitoring technique using continuous-wave (CW) Doppler radar is presented. The CW radar works with a DC-coupled baseband that allows accurate monitoring of the slow-varying water level. Ray tracing model has been used to simulate and validate the feasibility of water level monitoring in the presence of ripple.The proposed technique is robust against clutter interference and the fluctuation of water ripples by properly choosing the carrier frequency. Experiment was carried out to monitor th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The MS5803 module’s drift issue suggests that current off-the-shelf, pressure-based, and low-cost water level sensors do not yet have the long-term durability as their high-end counterparts. Although ultrasonic/radar based water level sensor has already proved its accuracy for large asset monitoring [ 23 , 24 ], it will still be easier to have a pressure-based sensor in the water to monitor the level together with other quality parameters in one setting. The future research of low-cost water depth sensing should focus on reducing the cost of current high-end sensor chips.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The MS5803 module’s drift issue suggests that current off-the-shelf, pressure-based, and low-cost water level sensors do not yet have the long-term durability as their high-end counterparts. Although ultrasonic/radar based water level sensor has already proved its accuracy for large asset monitoring [ 23 , 24 ], it will still be easier to have a pressure-based sensor in the water to monitor the level together with other quality parameters in one setting. The future research of low-cost water depth sensing should focus on reducing the cost of current high-end sensor chips.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ultrasonic sensor, such as the Arduino compatible sensor HC-SR04 has been recognised as a cheap solution of water level sensing, which can be easily installed on top of the target waterbody such as an open water surface or a rainwater tank [ 22 ]. More recently, the continuous-wave Doppler radar sensor was introduced to achieve millimetre-level accuracy of water level sensing [ 23 ] and has been trialled in urban cities for inundation level detection [ 24 ]. However, the ultrasonic/radar sensing approach is less viable within the urban stormwater context due to: (1) unevenness of concrete walls inside stormwater manhole might, which affect sensor performance due to its wide detection angle; (2) debris carried by flow in urban drains might increase the sensor’s uncertainty; and (3) installation and calibration times of the ultrasonic sensor at each site are too lengthy.…”
Section: Sensor Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, because FMCW radar utilizes a millimeter wave, it has the advantages of low power consumption and small sized packaging [4], [5]. Owing to these properties, FMCW radar has been widely applied in various fields such as automotive control system [6], [7], gesture recognition [8], [9], structure monitoring [10], and waterlevel measurements [11], [12]. In biomedical applications, FMCW has been used for non-contact monitoring of vital signs (respiration and heartbeat) [1], [2], [13]- [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reflected and received signal is compared with the transmitted signal, while the frequency difference f d is measured corresponding to the time difference t d for the calculation of the measured distance L. The frequency difference may be measured very precisely, and therefore also the measured distance may be determined with a high accuracy (see Fig. 2) (Kim and Lee, 2012;Wang et al, 2013;Mikuš and Harťanský, 2013;Mikuš, Harťanský and Čičáková, 2014).…”
Section: Frequency (Fmcw) Radar Sensormentioning
confidence: 99%