2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11422-016-9758-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High school biology evolution learning experiences in a rural context: a case of and for cultural border crossing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A commonly adopted pedagogy in rural education studies is from a place-based perspective that incorporates students' local community experience with broader concerns in discipline-specific practices (Avery 2013;Zimmerman and Weible 2017). The literature indicated when rural students' local knowledge is valued, their academic performance can be improved (Avery and Kassam 2011;Borgerding 2017;Zimmerman and Weible 2017). We were able to locate a handful of empirical studies on science education in rural areas.…”
Section: Rural Culture Local Knowledge and Science Learningmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A commonly adopted pedagogy in rural education studies is from a place-based perspective that incorporates students' local community experience with broader concerns in discipline-specific practices (Avery 2013;Zimmerman and Weible 2017). The literature indicated when rural students' local knowledge is valued, their academic performance can be improved (Avery and Kassam 2011;Borgerding 2017;Zimmerman and Weible 2017). We were able to locate a handful of empirical studies on science education in rural areas.…”
Section: Rural Culture Local Knowledge and Science Learningmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Several students described particular strategies to better manage their border crossings, and these included (i) recognizing that understanding evolution did not require its acceptance; (ii) viewing evolution as one of many available perspectives and thus was not dangerous to learn; and (iii) finding evolution learning personally useful to the students for various reasons. Second, Borgerding (in press) later explored the role of a biology teacher as a “tour guide” assisting his rural students into the subculture of science. This biology teacher helped students navigate their various subcultures by (i) using his trusted position in the rural community; (ii) taking a position that he did not represent science but merely taught science “according to scientists;” (iii) honoring local funds of knowledge for learning evolution; and (iv) helping students identify how the culture of science and their lifeworlds may differ with respect to evolution.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework: Border Crossingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A valorização da realidade local é trazida como fator importante a ser levado em consideração quando se ensina ciências na zona rural. Borgerding (2016) argumenta que as comunidades rurais, em geral, são mais religiosas que as urbanas e, consequentemente, os jovens rurais também o são. Dessa forma, o ensino de alguns conceitos científicos, segundo a autora, pode representar um desafio aos docentes, já que esses conhecimentos podem contradizer ou enfrentar crenças religiosas.…”
Section: A Educação Rural Nos Artigos Internacionais Da áRea De Educaunclassified
“…Considerando todo o conjunto de artigos e a diferença entre os contextos e culturas, foi possível perceber diferentes formas de hibridismo na apropriação da educação do campo pela pesquisa em educação científica. Em vários artigos (ZIMMERMAN e WEIBLE, 2016, STAPLETON, 2016PANIAGO et al, 2014;BORGERDING, 2016;LOWAN-TRUDEAU, 2016; AVERY e HAINS, 2016), o conhecimento local é visto como importante, seja como parte de metodologias para ensinar o conteúdo científico seja para o ensino de temas da educação ambiental. Em outros (CARDOSO e ARAÚJO, 2012;COSTA et al, 2014;EPPLEY, 2016;ABRAMS e MIDDLETON, 2016;KASSAM et.…”
Section: Discussão E Considerações Finaisunclassified