2014
DOI: 10.2478/s13533-012-0145-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High resolution aerosol data from MODIS satellite for urban air quality studies

Abstract: Abstract:The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) provides daily global coverage, but the 10 km resolution of its aerosol optical depth (AOD) product is not suitable for studying spatial variability of aerosols in urban areas. Recently, a new Multi-Angle Implementation of Atmospheric Correction (MAIAC) algorithm was developed for MODIS which provides AOD at 1 km resolution. Using MAIAC data, the relationship between MAIAC AOD and PM 2 5 as measured by the 27 EPA ground monitoring stations was … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
24
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
24
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our overall RMSPE of 21.67 µg/m 3 from model cross validation is higher than those in studies on areas in the United States (<9.0 µg/m 3 ) [9,[13][14][15][16][17][35][36][37], but much lower than other results over the whole of China (32.98 µg/m 3 ), which might be mainly due to the much denser ground monitoring sites in our study area. Our method has a slightly higher overall RMSPE than do those studies in the same study area (Beijing) using the coarser 3 km spatial resolution for PM 2.5 estimation by Li (16.04 µg/m 3 ) [24] and Xie (17.85 µg/m 3 ) [25], but with higher R 2 .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…Our overall RMSPE of 21.67 µg/m 3 from model cross validation is higher than those in studies on areas in the United States (<9.0 µg/m 3 ) [9,[13][14][15][16][17][35][36][37], but much lower than other results over the whole of China (32.98 µg/m 3 ), which might be mainly due to the much denser ground monitoring sites in our study area. Our method has a slightly higher overall RMSPE than do those studies in the same study area (Beijing) using the coarser 3 km spatial resolution for PM 2.5 estimation by Li (16.04 µg/m 3 ) [24] and Xie (17.85 µg/m 3 ) [25], but with higher R 2 .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…The role of RH has been controversially discussed in recent studies. While some do not find a significant influence of RH on the correlation of AOD and PM2.5 [28], others report that AOD is more representative of PM2.5 mass concentration under dry conditions, i.e., RH < 50% [12]. Results of a field campaign conducted in northeastern U.S. suggest that water uptake by particles can indeed play a major role in the relationship between AOD and PM2.5 [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…They conclude that when a low BLH is present, the satellite observes a very similar amount of particles as detected by ground-based measurements. In another study, [28] argue that in winter conditions in the Boston area, U.S.A., a shallow BLH would rather lead to low correlations between AOD and PM2.5. In these situations, particle concentrations are low in the upper parts of the atmosphere as particles are mostly confined within the shallow boundary layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are extensive studies investigating the PM2.5-AOD relationship by the use of either an empirical statistical method (Engel-Cox et al, 2004;Liu et al, 2005Liu et al, , 2009Gupta et al, 2006;Koelemeijer et al, 2006;Gupta and Christopher, 2008;Paciorek et al, 2008;Di Nicolantonio et al, 2009;Schaap et al, 2009;Lee et al, 2012;Sorek-Hamer et al, 2013;Strawa et al, 2013;Chudnovsky et al, 2014;Ma et al, 2014) or a chemical transportation model (Liu et al, 2004;Van Donkelaar et al, 2006Kessner et al, 2013;Xu et al, 2015). In these studies, aerosol vertical distributions are estimated based on model simulation or under an assumption that aerosols are well mixed within the boundary layer and then decrease exponentially with height.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%