2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-rate anaerobic treatment of wastewater from soft drink industry: Methods, performance and experiences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as the VFAs were no more produced (the total accumulation reduced), methanogens converted it into biogas more optimally, supported by the achieved ideal pH condition. Hindrance to methanogens activity because of VFAs accumulation and pH drop in high substrate loading was also reported by Zhang et al [26] and Cuff et al [27]. As for the F/M = 0.56, it was expected that the rate of methane production could be the fastest, as the number of biomass was about double the available organic substrate, but the data revealed a divergent pattern.…”
Section: B the Dynamics Of Process Parameterssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…However, as the VFAs were no more produced (the total accumulation reduced), methanogens converted it into biogas more optimally, supported by the achieved ideal pH condition. Hindrance to methanogens activity because of VFAs accumulation and pH drop in high substrate loading was also reported by Zhang et al [26] and Cuff et al [27]. As for the F/M = 0.56, it was expected that the rate of methane production could be the fastest, as the number of biomass was about double the available organic substrate, but the data revealed a divergent pattern.…”
Section: B the Dynamics Of Process Parameterssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Expanded granular sludge bed (EGSB) was further developed to enhance substrate-biomass interaction within the treatment system by expanding the sludge bed and increasing hydraulic mixing compared to UASB (Niwa et al 2016;Cuff et al 2018). Although well-established UASB and/or EGSB configurations mostly meet the requirements necessary for anaerobic treatment, unfavourable conditions regarding the disintegration of granules led to the development of AnMBR by coupling membrane technology with anaerobic treatment.…”
Section: Brief Evolution Of Anaerobic Schemes As the Core Of The Biormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mao et al, 2015 reported that the optimum pH range for an anaerobic single stage or batch process should be 6.8 -7.4[15]. Similar findings on the obstruction of methane production because of VFAs accumulation and low pH were reported byCuff et al, 2018 and Zhang et al, 2019 [16,17]. C/N = 20 and C/N = 30 had comparable patterns of pH transition, and the recovered pH was similar in the range of 6.6 -7.1, suggesting the methanogenesis could smoothly occur.…”
mentioning
confidence: 60%