2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3519-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High prevalence of co-infection between human papillomavirus (HPV) 51 and 52 in Mexican population

Abstract: BackgroundHuman papillomavirus (HPV) is associated with the genesis of cervical carcinoma. The co-infection among HPV genotypes is frequent, but the clinical significance is controversial; in Mexico, the prevalence and pattern of co-infection differ depending on the geographic area of study. We analyzed the mono- and co-infection prevalence of multiple HPV genotypes, as well as preferential interactions among them in a Mexico City sample population.MethodsThis study was designed as a retrospective cohort study… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
21
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
8
21
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In respect to the individual prevalence of each genotype according to lesion grade, we observed a differential behavior, even within high-risk genotypes which are shown to increase as the lesion progresses; this is most relevant to HPV 16 genotype, which has been reported to increase its presence in direct relation to the lesion grade, even in a meta-analysis of 30,165 women with HPV infection [46], but different from our results which show that HPV 16 prevalence peaks at a high-grade lesion but then decreases when the lesion progresses to cancer. In the same way we found that a HPV 16–51 concomitant infection follows the same pattern, although we consider that this observation origins from an elevated prevalence of HPV 51 observed in our study, and which is corroborated by other authors like Gallegos-Bolaños et al, who report an elevated prevalence of co-infection between HPV 51 and 52 in the Mexican population [39]. Elsewhere, high prevalence of HPV 51 in high-grade lesions and developing cervical cancer have been found in co-infection with other common high-risk genotypes such as 16, 18 or 33, most likely due to the high prevalence of the aforementioned genotypes in their respective populations [4749].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In respect to the individual prevalence of each genotype according to lesion grade, we observed a differential behavior, even within high-risk genotypes which are shown to increase as the lesion progresses; this is most relevant to HPV 16 genotype, which has been reported to increase its presence in direct relation to the lesion grade, even in a meta-analysis of 30,165 women with HPV infection [46], but different from our results which show that HPV 16 prevalence peaks at a high-grade lesion but then decreases when the lesion progresses to cancer. In the same way we found that a HPV 16–51 concomitant infection follows the same pattern, although we consider that this observation origins from an elevated prevalence of HPV 51 observed in our study, and which is corroborated by other authors like Gallegos-Bolaños et al, who report an elevated prevalence of co-infection between HPV 51 and 52 in the Mexican population [39]. Elsewhere, high prevalence of HPV 51 in high-grade lesions and developing cervical cancer have been found in co-infection with other common high-risk genotypes such as 16, 18 or 33, most likely due to the high prevalence of the aforementioned genotypes in their respective populations [4749].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Also, Gallegos-Bolaños et al. found in 1,163 women and 166 men that the most common infection was caused by HPV 51 (42%), then 52 (38%) and 16 (37%) [39], similar to our results. Similarly, Gultekin et al, in a study including a million Turkish women, reported that the most frequent HPV genotype detected was 16, followed by 51 and 31 [40].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…HPV52 and 51 were also frequently found in this study; however, they were mostly detected as coinfections. Both genotypes have been commonly reported as single infections and also as coinfections; the presence of HPV51-52 and coinfections of three genotypes, such as HPV16-51-52, are frequently detected in coinfections [57,58].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HPV 16 and 18 co-infections were detected in 25 (41.7%) of the cases. However, co-infection up to 76% has been reported [25]. The prevalence and pattern of co-infection differ depending on the geographic area of study as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%