2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2011.12.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-flowrate, compact electroosmotic pumps with porous polymer track-etch membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The electroosmotic mobility µ eo was estimated by linear regression of flow velocity versus the mean applied potential, resulting in µ eo = (3.86 ± 0.22) × 10 −10 m 2 /V s, similar to what has been measured during previous characterization of the membrane-based pumping setup (Bengtsson and Robinson 2017). This value corresponds to (Haynes et al 2015) and the relative dielectric constant ε r = 80 (Kirby 2010;Nörtemann et al 1997). We estimate (but did not measure) a maximum hydrostatic pressure (at zero flow) to be approximately 100 mm H 2 O per V of applied potential based on our previous pump characterization (Bengtsson and Robinson 2017) with a similar pump membrane that had double the pore diameter and a maximum pressure of 25 mmH 2 O/V.…”
Section: Design and Performance Of The Electroosmotic Pumpsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The electroosmotic mobility µ eo was estimated by linear regression of flow velocity versus the mean applied potential, resulting in µ eo = (3.86 ± 0.22) × 10 −10 m 2 /V s, similar to what has been measured during previous characterization of the membrane-based pumping setup (Bengtsson and Robinson 2017). This value corresponds to (Haynes et al 2015) and the relative dielectric constant ε r = 80 (Kirby 2010;Nörtemann et al 1997). We estimate (but did not measure) a maximum hydrostatic pressure (at zero flow) to be approximately 100 mm H 2 O per V of applied potential based on our previous pump characterization (Bengtsson and Robinson 2017) with a similar pump membrane that had double the pore diameter and a maximum pressure of 25 mmH 2 O/V.…”
Section: Design and Performance Of The Electroosmotic Pumpsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Electroosmotic pumps (EOPs) operate on the principle of electroosmosis, which generates liquid flow through microfluidic channels when an electric field is applied along the channel (Kirby 2010). Electroosmosis is driven by the motion of ions that congregate at the interface between the liquid and the (chemically) charged channel walls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 5 shows the mass flux (calculated per unit membrane area) and the volumetric flow rate versus applied potential as well as the average of the current density measured for each applied potential. The maximum mass flux was measured to be 28 mg min −1 cm −2 , using 1 mM NaCl at 5 V. Similarly arranged measurements using other brands of track-etched polycarbonate membranes are reported to have flow rates (normalized by total cross-sectional pore area) up to 120 µl min −1 cm −2 per volt of applied potential, pumping deionized water (Kwon et al 2012;Wang et al 2012). For our membrane, we estimate a corresponding maximum normalized volumetric flow rate of 50 µl min −1 cm −2 per V of applied potential for 1 mM NaCl, pH 5.6, similar to that reported for a polycarbonate membrane in 1 mM borate buffer at pH 9 (Kwon et al 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The sub-mm thickness of these membranes results in a strong electric field (range 100-250 kV m −1 ), even when small potentials (2-5 V) are applied, resulting in significant flow even at potentials that are small enough to be supplied by, for example, standard AA batteries and used safely in consumer products. Several groups have previously shown that membranes of polycarbonate (PC), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and nylon can be incorporated in EOPs (Kwon et al 2012;Wang et al 2012;Wu et al 2016). PC membranes reportedly generate volumetric flow rates up to 120 µl min −1 per cm 2 of membrane area and V of applied potential (Eidsnes et al 2004;Kwon et al 2012; (…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation