Heterogeneous Submission Behavior and its Implications for Success in Innovation Contests with Public Submissions

Abstract

I nnovation contests are increasingly adopting a format where submissions are viewable by all contestants and the information structure changes during the contest. In such an "unblind" format, contestants must weigh the costs of revealing their submissions against the benefits of improving their submissions through emerging information. We take a closer look at how contestants solve problems in innovation contests with public submission of solutions-that is, unblind contests, by examining the implications of their submission behavior for contest outcomes. We analyze the submission behavior in terms of three dimensions: the position of first submission by the contestant, the number of submissions the contestant makes, and the length of active participation by the contestant. The econometric analysis of a large dataset of unblind innovation contests and participating contestants indicates that, despite the potential for free riding and intellectual property loss from disclosure of submissions, contestants who have a lower position of first submission are more likely to succeed in the contest. Further, we find some evidence of a curvilinear relationship between a contestant's number of submissions and her likelihood of success, indicating a potential "quality-quantity" trade-off in unblind innovation contests. Finally, our findings indicate that increasing the length of participation in a contest has a positive effect on a contestant's likelihood of success. Departing from prior studies on innovation contests, where a contestant's success is assumed to be a function of her prior experience and problem-solving skills, our study provides new empirical evidence that, in innovation contests with public submissions, the submission behavior of a contestant also plays an explanatory role in a contestant's success.

Exploring employee interactions and quality of contributions in intra‐organisational innovation platforms

“…Our results support previous studies, where the importance of managers in innovation communities has been identified as crucial in ensuring a constructive process that produces the desired outcomes for managers, thereby enabling them to engage in quick interventions and track progress (Dahl et al, 2011). Second, our study also supported the claims that feedback provided by platform moderators shortly after an idea submission is positively associated with active participation and that longer active participation in platform interactions positively benefits the participants (Bockstedt, Druehl, & Mishra, 2016;Wooten & Ulrich, 2017).…”

Managing the Crowds: The Effect of Prize Guarantees and In-Process Feedback on Participation in Crowdsourcing Contests

“…The growing body of research on crowdsourcing contests has studied contestant behaviors, including entry (Araujo 2013), effort (Huang et al 2012), and submission timing (Bockstedt et al 2016;Yang et al 2010). From a contest host's perspective, predictors of contest outcomes can be either static or time varying throughout the contest.…”

The Role of Inclusive Innovation in Promoting Social Sustainability

“…), transparency level of the identity of participants and submissions (Bockstedt et al. ), feedback mechanism (Mihm and Schlapp , Wooten and Ulrich ), and incentive and award structure (Ales et al. , , Erat and Krishnan , Körpeoğlu and Cho ); see Ales et al.…”