Understanding Heritage 2013
DOI: 10.1515/9783110308389.21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heritage Interpretation as Public Discourse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, research in non-interpretation fields has shown that Tilden's programmatic sequence cannot be guaranteed, i.e., awareness of the need to care for a resource does not automatically transfer into actions to care for the resource (Bush-Gibson & Rinfret, 2010;Clover, 2002;Halpenny, 2010;Ham, 2013;Silberman, 2013;Uzzell & Ballantyne, 1998;Vaske & Kobrin, 2001). In inspiration terminology, this may reflect people being inspired to different ends than protection of the resource and it begs the question, would agencies commit to focusing on inspiration in interpretation if it means accepting that visitors may be inspired to take actions that the agency is not advocating or may not even consider acceptable?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, research in non-interpretation fields has shown that Tilden's programmatic sequence cannot be guaranteed, i.e., awareness of the need to care for a resource does not automatically transfer into actions to care for the resource (Bush-Gibson & Rinfret, 2010;Clover, 2002;Halpenny, 2010;Ham, 2013;Silberman, 2013;Uzzell & Ballantyne, 1998;Vaske & Kobrin, 2001). In inspiration terminology, this may reflect people being inspired to different ends than protection of the resource and it begs the question, would agencies commit to focusing on inspiration in interpretation if it means accepting that visitors may be inspired to take actions that the agency is not advocating or may not even consider acceptable?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of these problems, the skilled moderation of dialogue with the aim of seeking possibilities for the co-existence of these versions and achieving a sharing of the space, a spatial compromise (van Assche and Duineveld, 2011;Silberman, 2013), is a major challenge in heritage planning . Both residents and public services should strive to eliminate any attempts at such forms of appropriation .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, a WH education that also considers the aims of ESD 2 should acknowledge the fact that WH is the result of a national and international negotiation process in order to debate on (global) political hierarchies, Eurocentrism, or repression of minorities [33]. Apart from this critical thinking approach it is necessary to widen heritage interpretation-as process and not product-to "places of the (re)creation of collective memory in which many perspectives, subjectivities, identities and values could be freely exchanged" [34] (p. 29). Hence, by means of reflexive methods a subjective or personal sense of place can be developed.…”
Section: World Heritage Education: Objectives and Blind Spotsmentioning
confidence: 99%