2020
DOI: 10.3390/su12208640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Young People’s Perceptions of World Cultural Heritage: Suggestions for a Critical and Reflexive World Heritage Education

Abstract: The paper analyses and discusses the perspectives of young people on World Cultural Heritage (WCH), focusing on their presumed reasons of its imbalanced global distribution. The qualitative study is based upon focus groups conducted with 43 secondary school students aged 14–17 years from Lower Saxony, Germany. The findings reveal Eurocentric thinking patterns. Furthermore, a site visit took place after the focus groups exploring the universal and personal values the participants attach to the WCH using hermene… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, Castro-Fernández et al's [16] survey of teachers in early childhood, primary and secondary education shows a marginal, irregular appearance of heritage within the curriculum. Similar studies involving student teachers and pupils from different levels of education have also been carried out in relation to other countries (such as Germany, Turkey and the United States) by authors such as Yeşilbursa and Barton [20], Dönmez and Yeşilbursa [21], Curtis and Seymour [24], Yeşilbursa and Uslu [47], and Röll and Meyer [48].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Finally, Castro-Fernández et al's [16] survey of teachers in early childhood, primary and secondary education shows a marginal, irregular appearance of heritage within the curriculum. Similar studies involving student teachers and pupils from different levels of education have also been carried out in relation to other countries (such as Germany, Turkey and the United States) by authors such as Yeşilbursa and Barton [20], Dönmez and Yeşilbursa [21], Curtis and Seymour [24], Yeşilbursa and Uslu [47], and Röll and Meyer [48].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Even more complicated is the search for the common ground if one speaks of the world, since it is difficult to maintain a memory that contributes to a world identity, due to the fact of maintaining ties between the individual and becoming global that psychologically unite a common memory that is hold over time. Thus, global citizenship in the interconnected world [5,14] continues to be more a wish than a reality [41,42]. Indeed, the closest and most singular identity references that categorize the subject of a broader social group respond to an idea of distinction with respect to the other, as an element of identification based on particular experiences that the other has not lived.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the described research project, participants visited a local WHs and were asked to take two photos. The first photo represented a universal view of the site, while the second photo showed a personal view [32,61]. This exercise can be used as a starting point to discuss different meanings of given sites, point towards conflicts between prescribed universal values and personal meanings and reflect upon how iconic images shape WHs as place.…”
Section: Conclusion: Towards a Postcolonial Approach To World Heritage Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%