2015
DOI: 10.1186/s13567-015-0207-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hepatitis E virus chronic infection of swine co-infected with Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus

Abstract: In developed countries, most of hepatitis E human cases are of zoonotic origin. Swine is a major hepatitis E virus (HEV) reservoir and foodborne transmissions after pork product consumption have been described. The risk for HEV-containing pig livers at slaughter time is related to the age at infection and to the virus shedding duration. Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV) is a virus that impairs the immune response; it is highly prevalent in pig production areas and suspected to influen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
60
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Exposure to co‐infecting pathogens: pig's status regarding PCV2 and PRRSV was recorded and pigs were categorized as PCV2 infected, PRRSV infected, or PCV2 and PRRSV infected, whatever the order of the infections. Sequence of co‐infections: First, ages at HEV/PCV2/PRRSV infection were calculated as followed: (1) pig's age at HEV infection was calculated as the age at HEV shedding minus 14 days, corresponding to HEV latency period as described in Salines et al (); (2) pig's age at PCV2 infection was calculated as the age at first PCV2 positive PCR minus 7 days, as described in literature (Andraud et al, , ); (3) similarly to the calculation of the age at HEV seroconversion, the age at PRRSV seroconversion was derived from the individual antibodies’ kinetics fitted with cubic splines; then, pig's age at PRRSV infection was calculated as the age at PRRSV seroconversion minus 7 days, as described in literature (Diaz, Darwich, Pappaterra, Pujols, & Mateu, ). Then, the sequence of infections was computed and four possible statuses were attributed to piglets: (i) infected by HEV first; (ii) infected by PCV2 first (i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… Exposure to co‐infecting pathogens: pig's status regarding PCV2 and PRRSV was recorded and pigs were categorized as PCV2 infected, PRRSV infected, or PCV2 and PRRSV infected, whatever the order of the infections. Sequence of co‐infections: First, ages at HEV/PCV2/PRRSV infection were calculated as followed: (1) pig's age at HEV infection was calculated as the age at HEV shedding minus 14 days, corresponding to HEV latency period as described in Salines et al (); (2) pig's age at PCV2 infection was calculated as the age at first PCV2 positive PCR minus 7 days, as described in literature (Andraud et al, , ); (3) similarly to the calculation of the age at HEV seroconversion, the age at PRRSV seroconversion was derived from the individual antibodies’ kinetics fitted with cubic splines; then, pig's age at PRRSV infection was calculated as the age at PRRSV seroconversion minus 7 days, as described in literature (Diaz, Darwich, Pappaterra, Pujols, & Mateu, ). Then, the sequence of infections was computed and four possible statuses were attributed to piglets: (i) infected by HEV first; (ii) infected by PCV2 first (i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…litter characteristics such as number of mummified, live‐born or weaned piglets, parity rank of the dam, maternal immunity) have not been investigated to date. Using mathematical modelling based either on experimental trials or on field studies revealed new insights on HEV infection dynamics (Andraud, Casas, Pavio, & Rose, ; Andraud et al, ; Salines et al, ). As such, a partial protection conferred by maternally derived antibodies (MDAs) was shown to delay HEV infection in growing pigs (Andraud et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, a PRRSV/HEV co-infection or a PRRSV infection prior to HEV infection delayed HEV shedding and the onset of the anti-HEV humoral immune response, increased the quantity of virus particles shed and extended the shedding period, increased the direct transmission rate and HEV infection susceptibility, and increased the proportion of HEV-positive livers at slaughter time [33, 36]. Thus, controlling intercurrent swine diseases (e.g.…”
Section: Improving Hev Surveillance and Control In The Swine Reservoimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In short, once introduced into a farm, HEV is then present continuously there because of repeated transmission among susceptible herds, i.e., pigs without appropriate immunity. Recently, Salines et al (11) reported that experimental porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) and HEV coinfection affect the HEV infection dynamics in 5-week-old pigs in the absence of the maternal antibody against these 2 endemic viruses. The simultaneous coinfection resulted in a prolonged latent period and HEV shedding period as compared to pigs infected with HEV only.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%