2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.03.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hepatic artery thrombosis and liver malignancy in pediatric liver transplantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(30 reference statements)
1
14
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These patients are at higher risk for thrombosis because of technical challenges associated with anastomoses of smaller vessels, use of segmental grafts, and the increased risk for thrombosis associated with hepatic malignant neoplasms. 23 This finding is similar to that of a previous series with incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis as high as 28%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These patients are at higher risk for thrombosis because of technical challenges associated with anastomoses of smaller vessels, use of segmental grafts, and the increased risk for thrombosis associated with hepatic malignant neoplasms. 23 This finding is similar to that of a previous series with incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis as high as 28%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…26,813,30 The incidence of bleeding in our cohort was also higher than what has been reported previously (20.7% vs. 5–15%), 11–13,30 but bleeding is reported inconsistently in prior cohorts and definitions vary, making the comparison difficult. Despite bleeding and thrombosis being similarly frequent events in our cohort, only thrombotic complications were associated with patient mortality.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…One study found a lower incidence of late HAT in an ASA prophylaxis group versus patients who did not receive prophylaxis (0.4% versus 2.2%), and another study found similar frequencies of late HAT in patients using ASA and patients not using ASA (1.2% versus 1.0%). HAT studies of pediatric patients have found no significant differences in early HAT incidence between patients using ASA and patients not using ASA or in the frequency of ASA or alprostadil usage between patients with HAT and patients without HAT . The benefits and risks of ASA in reducing HAT after LT have not been studied to our knowledge in randomized controlled trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…HAT studies of pediatric patients have found no significant differences in early HAT incidence between patients using ASA and patients not using ASA or in the frequency of ASA or alprostadil usage between patients with HAT and patients without HAT. 21,22 The benefits and risks of ASA in reducing HAT after LT have not been studied to our knowledge in randomized controlled trials. Therefore, one might argue that its use should not be recommended, but recommendations are frequently based on observational studies, at least in distinguished general medicine journals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%