1972
DOI: 10.1136/jech.26.1.33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Height, weight, and the assessment of obesity in children.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jayakar, Sgaramella, Galante, and Pennetti (1978) report an analysis in 7 11 year-olds which gives n = 2-31 for boys and n = 2-41 for girls, a finding not dissimilar to our own. The reason Newens and Goldstein (1972) find smaller coefficients is probably due to the narrower age range of their children, who were all 7-year-olds. We have calculated the value of the index at the upper 90th weight percentile for each height given by Newens and Goldstein in their table 1 when n=2"5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Jayakar, Sgaramella, Galante, and Pennetti (1978) report an analysis in 7 11 year-olds which gives n = 2-31 for boys and n = 2-41 for girls, a finding not dissimilar to our own. The reason Newens and Goldstein (1972) find smaller coefficients is probably due to the narrower age range of their children, who were all 7-year-olds. We have calculated the value of the index at the upper 90th weight percentile for each height given by Newens and Goldstein in their table 1 when n=2"5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…So percentage fat is effectively independent of height in a given age group, which suggests that if obesity is to be assessed by weight, the weight should be first standardized for height, for example by using an obesity index. Newens and Goldstein (1972), using very large numbers of children, show that the proportion of children classified as obese by an obesity index depends on height, especially at the extremes of the height range. The power transformation principally considered by those authors is W/H n where n is 1.70 for boys and 1.75 for girls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After adjustment had been made for sex and social class, because these have independent effects on height and weight, it was found that the mean height of children in the four groups did not differ significantly. 'Relative weight', that is, the weight expected for any given height, derived from the whole sample, was examined at 11 years of age to give a crude index of nutrition (Newens and Goldstein, 1972). Children with current attacks of asthma and/or wheezy bronchitis in whom the attacks occurred at least monthly were of significantly lower mean relative weight than children in the other three groups; on average about 4% lighter than expected.…”
Section: Height and Weightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 23 This study's sample size was sufficiently large and representative to allow the estimation of standard weights from its own data. In the adult years (20,26, and 36 years) body mass index was used, which is a fixed rather than BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL VOLUME 293 2 AUGUST 1986 age specific standard.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%