1982
DOI: 10.3133/ofr82793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat-flow measurements at shot points along the 1978 Saudi Arabia seismic deep-refraction line; Part I, Results of the measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Location of the shot points and a generalized geologic map of the area are shown in figure 1. The estimation of heat-flow and heat-generation values and their uncertainties is described in a companion report (Gettings and Showail, 1982); the resulting data are summarized in table 1 and figures 2 and 3. In figure 2, the heat-flow profile has been extended to include a heat-flow measurement from a deep borehole on the coastal plain (Mansiyah I, Girdler, 1970) and marine heat-flow measurements (Girdler and Evans, 1977) in both the shallow-and deep-water areas of the Red Sea in a swath 200 km wide that trends 236° across the Red Sea.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Location of the shot points and a generalized geologic map of the area are shown in figure 1. The estimation of heat-flow and heat-generation values and their uncertainties is described in a companion report (Gettings and Showail, 1982); the resulting data are summarized in table 1 and figures 2 and 3. In figure 2, the heat-flow profile has been extended to include a heat-flow measurement from a deep borehole on the coastal plain (Mansiyah I, Girdler, 1970) and marine heat-flow measurements (Girdler and Evans, 1977) in both the shallow-and deep-water areas of the Red Sea in a swath 200 km wide that trends 236° across the Red Sea.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The determined by Förster et al (2007) is at the upper end of range previously measured in Jordan (42-65 ;Galanis et al, 1986). However, it deviates significantly from values reported for the Saudi Arabian part of the shield, outside of the Red Sea rift (36-45 ;Gettings and Showail, 1982). This discrepancy is probably related to the poor data quality that characterizes the heatflow estimates from Saudi Arabia.…”
Section: Surface Heat Flow and Lithospheric Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…We tested the sensitivity of our thermal model to a larger initial SHF of 34 mW/m 2 (the best estimate of Gettings & Showail (1982) for measurement #1 is 34 ± 4 mW/m 2 ) ( Fig. 12b), which predicts SHF of 48 mW/m 2 at 0 Myr model time due to the high shallow thermal conductivity.…”
Section: Sensitivity Of Thermal Modeling Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%