2000
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-1182-2_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hearing in Birds and Reptiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
226
1
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(238 citation statements)
references
References 181 publications
9
226
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these cues vary by similar amounts within naturally occurring songs (1-3% for pitch, 1-4% for duration), females showed much narrower tolerance for pitch than for duration. Females generalized over a wider range than the 0.5% just noticeable difference for pitch measured in most avian species (Dooling et al 2000), suggesting that discrimination abilities did not limit birds' ability to perform the classification task on pitch-shifted stimuli. However, performance on pitch-shifted stimuli fell to chance rapidly once stimuli fell outside of the range of natural variation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Although these cues vary by similar amounts within naturally occurring songs (1-3% for pitch, 1-4% for duration), females showed much narrower tolerance for pitch than for duration. Females generalized over a wider range than the 0.5% just noticeable difference for pitch measured in most avian species (Dooling et al 2000), suggesting that discrimination abilities did not limit birds' ability to perform the classification task on pitch-shifted stimuli. However, performance on pitch-shifted stimuli fell to chance rapidly once stimuli fell outside of the range of natural variation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…These observations strongly suggest that N. lasiopterus handles and eats birds in flight just as aerial-hawking bats normally do with insects. The greater noctule can approach and surprise the birds without being detected, because its echolocation frequency is far above the ''auditory space'' (0.5-6.0 kHz) of the birds (15).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, we used broadband white noise instead of field noise playbacks. White noise signals are commonly used in the study of noise effects on animal behaviour (Caldwell et al, 2009;Chan, Stahlman, et al, 2010;Dooling, Lohr, & Dent, 2000;Mazzoni, Lucchi, Cokl, Presern, & Virant-Doberlet, 2009;Schilcher, 1976;Warkentin, 2005), and can be reproduced consistently under our experimental settings. Since this study focused on overall noise amplitude rather than frequency-specific effects, the usage of white noise is valid in testing our hypotheses.…”
Section: Rms Amplitude (Cmmentioning
confidence: 99%