2014
DOI: 10.1590/1413-78522014220200456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health economics and health preference concepts to orthopedics practitioners

Abstract: The aim of this study was to describe concepts of health economics in order to update and provide the orthopedic practitioner decision making parameters based on preferences. Four basic types of studies of economical evaluation were presented (cost minimization analysis, cost-benefit, cost-effectiveness and cost-utility), as well as the origin, the concept, advantages and disadvantages of using QALY and utility. It was discussed the importance of costs and of SF-6D, an instrument able to get through the utilit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Utilities represent the strength of individual preferences for different health states, and are an important measure for determining patient’s quality of life. 64 Utility values range between 0 (representing death) and 1 (perfect health), with higher values representing better quality of life with the associated health condition. 64 In this review, two studies were identified that estimated utility values in presbyopia patients using a patient preference-based, time trade-off methodology.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Utilities represent the strength of individual preferences for different health states, and are an important measure for determining patient’s quality of life. 64 Utility values range between 0 (representing death) and 1 (perfect health), with higher values representing better quality of life with the associated health condition. 64 In this review, two studies were identified that estimated utility values in presbyopia patients using a patient preference-based, time trade-off methodology.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 64 Utility values range between 0 (representing death) and 1 (perfect health), with higher values representing better quality of life with the associated health condition. 64 In this review, two studies were identified that estimated utility values in presbyopia patients using a patient preference-based, time trade-off methodology. 65 , 66 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CSG is based on the Standard Gamble, which is the classical method of measuring cardinal preferences for health outcomes and serves as the foundation on which other utility measurements are reviewed (SF-6D is based on the Standard Gamble) (Araujo et al., 2014; Garza and Wyrwich, 2003; Neumann et al., 2000). It is known that the Standard Gamble results in higher utilities due to participant risk aversion, as participants are often reluctant to gamble their current health against death (Araujo et al., 2014). To mitigate this, we used the CSG, which introduced an intermediate anchor state, so patients did not have to gamble against death, but instead gamble their current health against median nerve transection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The survey is scored by recoding the items, computing the raw scale scores, and transforming the scores to a range from 0 to 100 according to the standard scoring algorithm. Higher scores indicate a better health status.Health economics assessment (HEA) will be assessed to determine the cost minimization [32] related to the intervention, with items on: (i) number of physician visits, (ii) use of prescription drugs, and (iii) incidence of inpatient hospitalization.A demographic questionnaire (DQ) will be used to collect information on age, education level, marital status, number and age of children, employment status, financial hardship, number of care recipients, total number of hours of caregiving per week (for the older adult care recipient and children, if appropriate), length of caring (years/months of caregiving), assistance received from other family members (including number of people providing care), paid/occasional caregivers, receipt of comprehensive social security assistance, need for financial support, and number of years living in Hong Kong. Information will also be collected regarding the care recipient’s health and dependency including age, health problems, disabilities, and degree of dependency on the caregiver.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Health economics assessment (HEA) will be assessed to determine the cost minimization [32] related to the intervention, with items on: (i) number of physician visits, (ii) use of prescription drugs, and (iii) incidence of inpatient hospitalization.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%