Health-care providers’ experiences with opt-out HIV testing: a systematic review

Abstract

HIV is now a manageable chronic disease with a good prognosis, but early detection and referral for treatment are vital. In opt-out HIV testing, patients are informed that they will be tested unless they decline. This qualitative systematic review explored the experiences, attitudes, barriers, and facilitators of opt-out HIV testing from a health-care provider (HCP) perspective. Four articles were included in the synthesis and reported on findings from approximately 70 participants, representing diverse geographical regions and a range of human development status and HIV prevalence. Two synthesized findings emerged: HCP attitudes and systems. The first synthesized finding encompassed HCP decision-making attitudes about who and when to test for HIV. It also included the assumptions the HCPs made about patient consequences. The second synthesized finding related to systems. System-related barriers to opt-out HIV testing included lack of time, resources, and adequate training. System-related facilitators included integration into standard practice, support of the medical setting, and electronic reminders. A common attitude among HCPs was the outdated notion that HIV is a terrible disease that equates to certain death. Some HCPs stated that offering the HIV test implied that the patient had engaged in immoral behaviour, which could lead to stigma or disengagement with health services. This paternalism diminished patient autonomy, because patients who were excluded from opt-out HIV testing could have benefited from it. One study highlighted the positive aspects of opt-out HIV testing, in which participants underscored the professional satisfaction that arose from making an HIV diagnosis, particularly when marginalized patients could be connected to treatment and social services. Recommendations for opt-out HIV testing should be disseminated to HCPs in a broad range of settings. Implementation of system-related factors such as electronic reminders and care coordination procedures should be considered, and a social-justice commitment among HCPs should be encouraged.

Integrated opioid substitution therapy and HIV care: a qualitative systematic review and synthesis of client and provider experiences

“…We reviewed and synthesised qualitative research documenting PWUD and provider experiences of integrated OST and HIV care. Qualitative research, and reviews of it, is valuable for understanding how care is experienced which can inform appropriate and acceptable services (Glenton, Lewin, & Gülmezoglu, 2016; Jones et al, 2014; Leidel, Wilson, McConigley, Boldy, & Girdler, 2015; Treloar & Rhodes, 2009; Tuthill, McGrath, & Young, 2014).…”

Evaluating Point‐of‐Care HIV Screening in Dental Hygiene Education Settings: Patient, Faculty, and Student Perspectives

“…Our findings do not support their rationale. On the contrary, perhaps the barrier is not the scope of practice per se as much as it is a lack of knowledge and training, time, space, confidentiality, and burdensome consent processes that might prevent dental professionals from offering the screening as discussed by Hutchinson et al 12 and Leidel et al 14 Furthermore, our study found that a formal relationship with health care professional support was a facilitator of this type of service.…”

“…The importance of training in HIV, counseling skills, and testing procedures to successfully carry out POC HIV screening cannot be overstated 3 , 13 , 14 . Greenberg et al argued that most barriers to successful implementation of POC HIV screening could be addressed with additional education and practical implementation strategies 15 .…”

Representações e práticas de cuidado de profissionais de saúde às pessoas com HIV

“…Throughout the epidemic, it has become clear the attendance, care, caution and concern of professionals during their care for the PLHIV, demystifying the proximity of death and considering AIDS as a chronic condition which requires comprehensive and constant care. In this sense, international studies also reveal that HIV is being considered as chronic, evolving from a life-threatening infection to a manageable condition in the long term due to advances in medicine, radical changes in health and social assistance policies, and the impact of population aging, with early detection and referral to treatment being vital (16)(17) .…”