2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10796-012-9385-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Harnessing global expertise: A comparative study of expertise profiling methods for online communities

Abstract: Building expertise profiles in global online communities is a critical step in leveraging the range of expertise available in the global knowledge economy. In this paper we introduce a three-stage framework that automatically generates expertise profiles of online community members. In the first two stages, document-topic relevance and user-document association are estimated for calculating users' expertise levels on individual topics. We empirically compare two state-ofthe-art information retrieval techniques… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Source credibility captures authority and reliability of information (Chaiken, 1980), and is composed of two parts: competence and trustworthiness. Physicians in the OHC are registered under their real names to stimulate perceived trustworthiness, while competence is reflected in the physicians' knowledge and expertise (Lewandowsky, Little, & Kalish, 2007;Liu, Wang, Johri, Zhou, & Fan, 2012). Knowledge could not be directly measured in our study; we measured it using data on physician's past online experience in terms of adoption rate and user satisfaction, collected from the physician's profile.…”
Section: Independent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Source credibility captures authority and reliability of information (Chaiken, 1980), and is composed of two parts: competence and trustworthiness. Physicians in the OHC are registered under their real names to stimulate perceived trustworthiness, while competence is reflected in the physicians' knowledge and expertise (Lewandowsky, Little, & Kalish, 2007;Liu, Wang, Johri, Zhou, & Fan, 2012). Knowledge could not be directly measured in our study; we measured it using data on physician's past online experience in terms of adoption rate and user satisfaction, collected from the physician's profile.…”
Section: Independent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use LMs to represent user profiles. The user profiling in our work profiles the historical tags used by individuals, and the purpose is different from the previous work on profiling users' expertise (e.g., Liu, Wang, Johri, Zhou, & Fan, ). As discussed in this article, the proposed methods improve on the prediction accuracy over the method by Serdyukov et al.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies attempt to measure expertise in an online Q&A community [3,6,9,11,12], mostly to find experts who can best answer a specific new question. Some studies find expertise of users in different 'topics' of expertise [6,9,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies find expertise of users in different 'topics' of expertise [6,9,11]. For example, Liu et al [6] found question topics using Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) in a StackExchange community. But we found these topics to be too specific for characterizing expertise shapes, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%