Harmful Effect of Beer on Bovine Enamel Microhardness – In Vitro Study

Zanatta, Rayssa Ferreira; Esper, Maria Ângela Lacerda Rangel; Valera, Márcia Carneiro; Melo, Renata Marques de; Bresciani, Eduardo

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0163440

Cited by 9 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Mean of Carlsberg 4.16 -9.6 40.0 17.5 8.3 --Corona (Lussi et al, 2004) 4.20 -4.6 8.2 --Heineken (MA et al, 2016;Nogueira et al, 2000;Seow & Thong, 2005;Zanatta et al, 2016) 4.80 7.20* -…”

Section: Literature Review and Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The pH, titratable acid and buffer effect are described in tables 1 (alcoholic beverages); 2 (energy and sport drinks); 3 (coffee and tea); 4 (mineral water and sparkling water); 5 (milk products, fruit and miscellaneous); 6 (soft drinks); 7 (fruit juices) and 8 (Kombucha tea with 14 days of fermentation). Research, Society and Development, v. 9, n. 11, e44191110004, 2020 (CC BY 4.0) | ISSN 2525-3409 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i11.10004 6 (Nogueira, Souza & Nicolau, 2000) 3.92 9.15* ------Bavária (Nogueira et al, 2000) 4.63 6.40* ------Brahma (Nogueira et al, 2000;Zanatta, Esper, Valera, Melo & Bresciani, 2016) 3.87 9.15* -…”

Section: Literature Review and Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The extrinsic factor that can influence dental corrosion include the consumption of acidity foods and beverages (MA et al, 2016;Nogueira et al, 2000;Zanatta, Esper, Valera, Melo, & Bresciani, 2016). This biocorrosion can be related to pH of those foods and beverages since the critical pH for enamel dissolution is 5.5.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Coca-Cola (Carvalho et al, 2017;Cochrane et al, 2012;Kitchens et al, 2007;Larsen & Nyvad, 1999;Lussi & Carvalho, 2015;Lussi et al, 2004;Lussi et al, 2012;Seow & Thong, 2005;Zanatta et Coca-Cola Light (Lussi et al, 2012) 2.60 --19.0 7.3 --Pepsi (Larsen & Nyvad, 1999;Lussi & Carvalho, 2015;Lussi et al, 2012;Seow & Thong, 2005) 2 (Lussi et al, 2004;Lussi et al, 2012) 3. (Kitchens et al, 2007) 3 (Lussi et al, 2004) 2.50 -51.0 88.6 ---Schweppes Indian (Larsen & Nyvad, 1999) 2.48 ----47 68…”

Section: Colamentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Analysis of the potential for dental wear of acidic diet: Literature review

Vilela

Machado

Rangel

et al. 2020

RSD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The aim of this study was to perform an acid wear properties review (pH, entitlement and buffering effect) of diets that can influence dental and restorative aging. Methodology: Manuscripts from the Pubmed database were collected. The search terms were: “Dental erosion”, “Erosion”, “Food habits”, “acidity”, “tooth enamel solubility”, “carbonated drinks”, “hydroxyapatite” and “alcoholic beverage consumption” between the years of 1995 and 2020. Result: 755 manuscripts were initially obtained, but after analyzing the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 15 manuscripts were selected at the end. After analyzing the 15 manuscripts included in the literature review, the results of the study showed that most of the diets evaluated had a pH lower than 5.5, except for coffee and mineral water. The soft drinks and Kombucha had lower pH values and therefore more corrosive potential. Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, it may be concluded that most of the diets evaluated present a corrosive potential for dental structure and restorative materials.

show abstract

“…Mean of Carlsberg 4.16 -9.6 40.0 17.5 8.3 --Corona (Lussi et al, 2004) 4.20 -4.6 8.2 --Heineken (MA et al, 2016;Nogueira et al, 2000;Seow & Thong, 2005;Zanatta et al, 2016) 4.80 7.20* -…”

Section: Literature Review and Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Review and Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Colamentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Analysis of the potential for dental wear of acidic diet: Literature review

Vilela

Machado

Rangel

et al. 2020

RSD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…4 The erosion begins with the softening of the enamel surface, mainly characterized by a reduction in microhardness. 5 This erosion is a multifactorial, irreversible process resulting from internal, external or idiopathic factors. 6 Intrinsic etiological factors, which are caused by the contact of dental tissue with stomach acids, include eating disorders, regurgitation and reflux 7 ; acidic drugs, diet, environment, and behavioral factors are external etiological factors.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

In vitro evaluation of the effects of frequently prescribed pediatric drugs on the microhardness of permanent tooth enamel

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. Dental erosion is considered one of the oral cavity diseases. Frequent intake of liquid oral medications can be an effective factor in tooth erosion. Objectives. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of frequently prescribed pediatric drugs on the permanent dental enamel microhardness over a period of 14 days in vitro. Material and methods. In this study, 11 pediatric drugs with different active ingredients were used; the control group consisted of teeth immersed in distilled water. The immersion cycles were applied 3 times a day for 1 min. The measurements of the samples prepared were taken at 0 (baseline), 7 and 14 days after the immersion cycles using a Vickers hardness testing machine. The pH, titratable acidity (TA) and buffering capacity of the syrups were assessed. Results. The measurements of the tooth samples that were immersed in drug solutions except Deltacortril ® showed that there was a significant difference between days 0, 7 and 14. The microhardness values for the tooth samples that were immersed in the Deltacortril drug solution decreased, but no significant difference was found. There were no statistically significant differences between the day 0, 7 and 14 measurements in the control group. Conclusions. Commonly used and prescribed pediatric drugs pose a risk for tooth erosion. Pediatricians should be aware of the effects of prescription drugs on erosion, and stress the need for compliancy with oral hygiene procedures.

show abstract

Evaluation of the microhardness of different resin‐based dental restorative materials treated with gastric acid: Scanning electron microscopy–energy dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy analysis

Ünal

Candan

İpek

et al. 2021

Microscopy Res & Technique

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study is to evaluate the microhardness, relative surface roughness, and elemental changes of resin‐based dental restorative materials (RDRMs) after gastric acid treatment. Five different RDRMs (Group 1 [Filtek Z550], Group 2 [Beautifil II], Group 3 [Vertise Flow], Group 4 [Dyract XP], Group 5 [Fuji II LC]) were used. Samples were formed by using plexiglass molds of 10 mm diameter and 2 mm thickness. A total of 50 samples (n = 10) for microhardness tests and a total of 15 samples (n = 3) for scanning electron microscopy (SEM)–energy dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy (EDX) analysis were prepared. All samples of each group were treated to gastric acid, simultaneously. A Vickers microhardness tester was used to evaluate the microhardness of the upper surfaces of each sample. SEM–EDX system was used for microstructure and elemental composition detection. The SEM–EDX, microhardness and relative surface roughness analysis were made prior to treatment in gastric acid for 14 days and analysis were repeated on the 14th day. As the difference in the microhardness values of RDRMs was compared, the time‐dependent variation in all RDRMs was found to be statistically significant. It was observed that a drastic decrease in microhardness values was in Beautifil II, Filtek Z550, Vertise Flow, Fuji II LC, and Dyract XP, respectively. Average decrease rate of microhardness values compared to the initial state can be listed from high to low as Beautifil II (%35.72), Vertise Flow (% 28.88), Fuji II LC (% 21.09), Dyract XP (%17.60), and Filtek Z550 (% 16.58). As a result, in in‐vitro conditions gastric acid decreased microhardness while increasing the relative surface roughness of RDRMs.

show abstract

Harmful Effect of Beer on Bovine Enamel Microhardness – In Vitro Study

Cited by 9 publications

References 24 publications

Analysis of the potential for dental wear of acidic diet: Literature review

Analysis of the potential for dental wear of acidic diet: Literature review

In vitro evaluation of the effects of frequently prescribed pediatric drugs on the microhardness of permanent tooth enamel

Evaluation of the microhardness of different resin‐based dental restorative materials treated with gastric acid: Scanning electron microscopy–energy dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About