Handling maintenance priorities using multi criteria decision making

Nordgård, Dag Eirik; Heggset, J.; Ostgulen, E.

doi:10.1109/ptc.2003.1304375

Cited by 8 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, a holistic evaluation scheme for the maintenance projects including all the different criteria is not easily available. A way of dealing with this task is to include Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods as part of this decision process, [1][2][3][4][5].…”

Section: The Practical Challengementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Experience has shown that Norwegian hydropower companies usually find 4-5 criteria to be sufficient, [1].…”

Section: ) Identifying the Relevant Decision Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In several project activities performed by SINTEF Energy Research the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) [6] has been used to establish these weights and thereby to structure the handling of qualitative criteria, [1][2][3][4].…”

Section: ) Establishing Weights Between Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…During the latest years there has been done a significant amount of R&D projects in Norwegian Power companies to develop methods and tools for decision aid concerning evaluation and priorities of maintenance projects, [1,3,4].…”

Section: Experiences From Using Risk Evaluation Of Maintenance Prmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Other factors, that are difficult to quantify in monetary terms, will also appear within the decision frame. These factors are typically safety to personnel or public, working environment and environmental considerations -which all are important parts of the overall decision process, [1]. A common term for such factors is qualitative criteria.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Using risk analyses in a multi criteria decision making framework for evaluation of hydropower maintenance projects

Nordgård

Heggset

Daleng

2005

2005 IEEE Russia Power Tech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper presents a framework for using risk analysis together with multi criteria decision making methods as an analysing strategy for evaluating and prioritising different types of maintenance and renewal projects within a power company. Projects are being subject to risk evaluation related to a set of qualitative criteria, together with calculation of economic key figures such as the net present value of the project. The basics of the strategy are illustrated by experience data from risk evaluation of the project portfolio of a Norwegian hydropower production company.

show abstract

Section: The Practical Challengementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Experience has shown that Norwegian hydropower companies usually find 4-5 criteria to be sufficient, [1].…”

Section: ) Identifying the Relevant Decision Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: ) Establishing Weights Between Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Experiences From Using Risk Evaluation Of Maintenance Prmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Using risk analyses in a multi criteria decision making framework for evaluation of hydropower maintenance projects

Nordgård

Heggset

Daleng

2005

2005 IEEE Russia Power Tech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Insulation condition ranking of transformers through principal component analysis and analytic hierarchy process

Tee¹,

Liu²,

Wang³

2017

IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Preventive maintenance (PM) planning: a review

Basri

Razak

Ab-Samat

et al. 2017

JQME

137

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide comprehensive information on preventive maintenance (PM) planning and methods used in the industry in order to achieve an effective maintenance system. Design/methodology/approach The literature review is organized in a way that provides the general overview of the researches done in the PM. This paper discusses the literatures that had been reviewed on four main topics, which are the holistic view of maintenance policies, PM planning, PM planning concept and PM planning-based in developing optimal planning in executing PM actions. Findings PM policy is one of the original proactive techniques that has been used since the start of researches on maintenance system. Review of the methods presented in this paper shows that most researches analyse effectiveness using artificial intelligence, simulation, mathematical formulation, matrix formation, critical analysis and multi-criteria method. While in practice, PM activities were either planned based on cost, time or failure. Research trends on planning and methods for PM show that the variation of approaches used over the year from early 1990s until today. Practical implications Research about PM is known to be extensively conducted and majority of companies applied the policy in their production line. However, most analysis and method suggested in published literatures were done based on mathematical computation rather than focussing on solution to real problems in the industry. This normally would lead to the problems in understanding by the practitioner. Therefore, this paper presented researches on PM planning and suggested on the methods that are practical, simple and effective for application in the real industry. Originality/value The originality of this paper comes from its detail analysis of PM planning in term of its research focus and also direction for application. Extensive reviews on the methods adopted in relation to PM planning based on the planning-based such as cost-based, time-based and failure-based were also provided.

show abstract

Handling maintenance priorities using multi criteria decision making

Cited by 8 publications

References 4 publications

Using risk analyses in a multi criteria decision making framework for evaluation of hydropower maintenance projects

Using risk analyses in a multi criteria decision making framework for evaluation of hydropower maintenance projects

Insulation condition ranking of transformers through principal component analysis and analytic hierarchy process

Preventive maintenance (PM) planning: a review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About