2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.anpede.2018.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Half a century of Anales de Pediatría. Evolution of its main bibliometric indicators in the Web of Science and Scopus international databases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…34 When considering academic research databases, research comparing the most widely used databases, Web of Science and Scopus, shows that their datasets differ. 35,36 Scopus presents a larger volume of data and a wider coverage of journals and authors when compared to Web of Science. 36 Thus, Scopus has been used more widely in articles focused on bibliometric analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 When considering academic research databases, research comparing the most widely used databases, Web of Science and Scopus, shows that their datasets differ. 35,36 Scopus presents a larger volume of data and a wider coverage of journals and authors when compared to Web of Science. 36 Thus, Scopus has been used more widely in articles focused on bibliometric analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%