1997
DOI: 10.2307/6002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Habitat Profitability and Choice in a Sit-And-Wait Predator: Juvenile Salmon Prefer Slower Currents on Darker Nights

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
49
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Salmon in this study apparently choose positions with higher than average snout velocities, possibly to gain access to higher rates of invertebrate drift and increase their potential energy gain. Furthermore, boulders can also provide excellent feeding areas by funnelling the current, increasing the rate of invertebrate drift, and increasing the growth rate potential of a site (Metcalfe et al, 1997;Mitchell et al, 1998). To understand how juvenile salmonid microhabitat use relates to invertebrate drift, it would be necessary to follow focal fish to examine the interplay between velocity, invertebrate drift, and salmonid growth and survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salmon in this study apparently choose positions with higher than average snout velocities, possibly to gain access to higher rates of invertebrate drift and increase their potential energy gain. Furthermore, boulders can also provide excellent feeding areas by funnelling the current, increasing the rate of invertebrate drift, and increasing the growth rate potential of a site (Metcalfe et al, 1997;Mitchell et al, 1998). To understand how juvenile salmonid microhabitat use relates to invertebrate drift, it would be necessary to follow focal fish to examine the interplay between velocity, invertebrate drift, and salmonid growth and survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lunar illumination and lunar phase affect fish species in multiple manners, including visual detection of prey and predator camouflage, and may change fish distribution, thermal exposure, and activity patterns (Metcalfe et al 1997, Hanson et al 2008, Aarestrup et al 2009, Afonso & Hazin 2015, Papastamatiou et al 2015, Schabetsberger et al 2015. Shark prey species may modify vertical distributions according to the lunar phase (Schabetsberger et al 2013(Schabetsberger et al , 2015, suggesting that lunar phase (and illumination) influences the distribution of foraging sharks.…”
Section: Ecologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Atlantic salmon have been shown to change foraging strategies below light levels of 10 À1 lux, moving to areas of slow-moving water that, while not as rich in prey, allow more time for identification of prey items and night-time foraging (Metcalfe et al 1997). Light adaptations are also evident in lentic environments, where zooplankton engage in DVM in the water column to feed on phytoplankton during the night when they are less visible to predators (Young and Watt 1996).…”
Section: Ecosystem Functioningmentioning
confidence: 99%