2016
DOI: 10.3354/esr00744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial ecology of blue shark and shortfin mako in southern Peru: local abundance, habitat preferences and implications for conservation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the predictions of each index used in this work (NEI, NPGO, and ONI), it can be seen that the best fitting effect of blue shark catch was in the cold and neutral regime of SST anomalies (Figure 11a,b,c). The effect of SST anomalies that were shown with the MEI index reported by Adams et al (2016) in Peruvian waters, also reflected the preference of blue sharks in temperate waters or in La Niña events. Although some authors have modeled to demonstrate the influence of different factors on the distribution and abundance of blue sharks, their relationship with climate indices in the North Pacific Ocean has not yet been compared and explored to better understand their population dynamics.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering the predictions of each index used in this work (NEI, NPGO, and ONI), it can be seen that the best fitting effect of blue shark catch was in the cold and neutral regime of SST anomalies (Figure 11a,b,c). The effect of SST anomalies that were shown with the MEI index reported by Adams et al (2016) in Peruvian waters, also reflected the preference of blue sharks in temperate waters or in La Niña events. Although some authors have modeled to demonstrate the influence of different factors on the distribution and abundance of blue sharks, their relationship with climate indices in the North Pacific Ocean has not yet been compared and explored to better understand their population dynamics.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Among the most significant predictor variables (top predictor) used in various GAMs, developed by other authors to describe their possible influence on blue shark catch rates were the spatial–temporal factors (latitude, longitude, month, quarter, and year), environmental (SST, Chl), and fishing effort (hooks) stand out (Adams et al, 2016; Bigelow et al, 1999; Carvalho et al, 2011; Vögler et al, 2012; Walsh & Kleiber, 2001). Predictor variables such as SST, NPGO, Year, Lat, DistCoast‐Lat, Quarter‐Lat, and the fishing effort (Hook) were the most important and present in all the modeling analyses in our study, for each maturity group of blue sharks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While aspects of blue shark habitat preferences have been explored in the Atlantic (Adams, Flores, Flores, Aarestrup, & Svendsen, 2016;Campana et al, 2011;Carvalho et al, 2015;Howey, Wetherbee, Tolentino, & Shivji, 2017;Queiroz, Humphries, Noble, Santos, & Sims, 2012;Queiroz et al, 2005;Vandeperre, Aires-da-Silva, Fontes, et al, 2014a), the influence of the physical environment on regional blue shark distributions in the North Pacific has not yet been characterized outside of exclusively pelagic environments far from coastal influence. Here we use blue shark satellite tracking data and habitat modelling to address this knowledge gap through (a) identifying seasonal home range and key habitat areas in more coastal waters in the Northeast Pacific; (b) exploring the physical drivers of habitat selection across seasons; and (c) examining how the influence of these drivers varies among sexes and size classes across seasons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ocean temperature often relates to a species distribution exhibited by marine organisms due to physiological constraints (Manderson 2016), and water color properties are often considered proxies for in situ properties such as turbidity, salinity, and chlorophyll a concentrations, an indicator of primary productivity (Siegel et al 2005, Geiger et al 2013. Even though remotely sensed temperature and color are measured on the surface of the ocean, a growing number of studies have documented their value in predicting marine species distributions (Adams et al 2016.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%