2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10641-013-0211-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Habitat characteristics can influence fish assemblages in high latitude kelp forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are consistent with those of Efird & Konar (2014), who found substratum rugosity to be a significant predictor of fish assemblages in Alaska, USA. In other studies, black rockfish have been found on complex rock bottoms, near vertical bedrock walls, and inside or around kelp forests in high-and low-relief rocky terrain (Leaman 1976, Love et al 2002, Johnson et al 2003, Parker et al 2008, Efird & Konar 2014. Juveniles or sub-adults in our study may have migrated from shallow kelp forests into suitable (rockier) habitat.…”
Section: Importance Of Habitat Complexitysupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our results are consistent with those of Efird & Konar (2014), who found substratum rugosity to be a significant predictor of fish assemblages in Alaska, USA. In other studies, black rockfish have been found on complex rock bottoms, near vertical bedrock walls, and inside or around kelp forests in high-and low-relief rocky terrain (Leaman 1976, Love et al 2002, Johnson et al 2003, Parker et al 2008, Efird & Konar 2014. Juveniles or sub-adults in our study may have migrated from shallow kelp forests into suitable (rockier) habitat.…”
Section: Importance Of Habitat Complexitysupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These species occupy benthic zones because of the high structural complexity of benthic algal species and rocky substrates (Trebilco et al 2015), which afford protection from predators and refugia for fish prey (Eibling et al 1980, Efird andKonar 2014). These species occupy benthic zones because of the high structural complexity of benthic algal species and rocky substrates (Trebilco et al 2015), which afford protection from predators and refugia for fish prey (Eibling et al 1980, Efird andKonar 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increases in fish abundance we detected at 10 weeks post-harvest mainly reflect increases in benthic reefassociated species. These species occupy benthic zones because of the high structural complexity of benthic algal species and rocky substrates (Trebilco et al 2015), which afford protection from predators and refugia for fish prey (Eibling et al 1980, Efird andKonar 2014). Removals of M. pyrifera have been shown to alter understory algal community dynamics, which in turn influence the abundances of benthic invertebrate species (Arkema et al 2009, Miller et al 2015.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can alter ecological interactions even within single patches or gaps (Mota et al, 2015). In biological terms, differences between edges and interiors are found in the properties of the canopy-forming organism itself (e.g., Brun et al, 2003); in faunal abundances (e.g., Barbera-Cebrian et al, 2002;Bologna and Heck, 2002;Efird and Konar, 2014); in the levels of thermal (Jurgens and Gaylord, 2016) and mechanical (Folkard, 2005) stresses experienced by organisms; and in terms of sediment quality (e.g., Alves et al, 2017). Local diversity and distribution of benthic fauna is intimately associated with canopy type and distribution (e.g., Begin et al, 2004;Bouma et al, 2009).…”
Section: Distribution Of Canopy-dwelling Organismsmentioning
confidence: 99%