Guiding classroom discussions for democratic citizenship education

Abstract

Classroom discussion is frequently proposes as an essential part of democratic citizenship education. Literature, however, pays little attention to what kind of discussion is most effective and how teachers can facilitate a discussion. This study aims to contribute to the development of a framework for analysing the characteristics of classroom discussions and the different roles teachers can adopt in guiding a discussion on controversial issues. In addition, we investigated how the way teachers guide the discussion is related to the structure and content features of the discussion. The framework was used to analyse five classroom discussions in secondary education. Our framework appeared to be useful for revealing differences in the structure and content features of the classroom discussions and in the way teachers guide the discussion. The results also indicated that a high degree of teacher regulation was related to high content quality and more participation from students. A high degree of student regulation was linked to more genuine discussion among students. The study underlines the importance of taking account of the teacher's role in research into the effectiveness of classroom discussions for democratic citizenship education and the study makes useful suggestions for teachers when preparing for a classroom discussion.

Peer-to-peer dialogue about teachers’ written feedback enhances students’ understanding on how to improve writing skills

“…Since peers use a language that is well understood by fellow students, they can make a valuable contribution to the feedback process. Moreover, they are cognitively and socially more congruent with fellow students than with teachers (Bloxham and West 2004;Schuitema et al 2018). Peer feedback is also known to enhance students' sense of belonging to the group, which can motivate students to learn from each other (Bloxham and West 2007).…”

Development of Critical Thinking Skills Through the Citizenship Education Course in the Era of Industrial Revolution 4.0

“…When associated with the objectives of Civic Education, critical thinking is an important thing to achieve that goal. Citizens need to have the ability to distinguish between substantial demands about something with those who are not, able to assess the accuracy of the information they receive, be able to determine the truth level of a statement, be able to separate information that is relevant to those who do not, or know the subjective elements in a statement [55].…”

Australian schools as deliberative spaces: framing the goal of active and informed citizenship

“…We have argued that there is likely to be important value in providing a more developed conceptual and practical model of democracy to underpin the goal of educating young Australians to be and become democratic citizens. While there is a developing body of empirical research studies which report on practises of deliberative democracy within schools (see, for example, Hess and McAvoy, 2015;Schuitema et al, 2018;Nishiyama, 2018;, very little exists on such practises within Australian schools. Clearly, there is a need for research in the Australian context (and perhaps elsewhere) which interrogates how schools are (or indeed are not) deliberative, how such deliberation is fostered and experienced, and how these relate to student understandings and engagements with democracy.…”