Guidelines for the design, conduct and reporting of human intervention studies to evaluate the health benefits of foods

Abstract

There is substantial evidence to link what we eat to the reduction of the risk of major chronic diseases and/or the improvement of functions. Thus, it is important for public health agencies and the food industry to facilitate the consumption of foods with particular health benefits by providing consumer products and messages based on scientific evidence. Although fragmentary advice is available from a range of sources, there is a lack of comprehensive scientific guidelines for the design, conduct and reporting of human intervention studies to evaluate the health benefits of foods. Such guidelines are needed both to support nutrition science in general, and to facilitate the substantiation of health claims. In the present study, which presents the consensus view of an International Life Sciences Institute Europe Expert Group that included senior scientists from academia and industry, the term ‘foods’ refers to foods, dietary supplements and food constituents, but not to whole diets. The present study is based on an initial survey of published papers, which identified the range and strengths and weaknesses of current methodologies, and was finalised following exchanges between representatives from industry, academia and regulatory bodies. The major factors involved in the design, conduct and reporting of studies are identified, summarised in a checklist table that is based on the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines, and elaborated and discussed in the text.

Dietary treatment of weight loss in patients with advanced cancer and cachexia: A systematic literature review

“…Unfortunately it is not possible to administer an intervention trial based on counselling as a double-blind experiment in order to conclude that any difference that develops between the groups is directly caused by the factor under investigation [39]. It is therefore of great importance to evaluate the compliance when evaluating the effect of dietary counselling.…”

Meta-Analysis of Long-Chain Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids (LCω-3PUFA) and Prostate Cancer

“…The review was conducted in accordance with established guidelines for systematic reviews specific to human intervention studies in nutritional science (64). Eligible study designs were prospective studies (including cohorts and randomized controlled trials) published in English language that reported quantitative data for LCv-3PUFAs (dietary intake, supplemental intake, or biomarker status).…”

Fruit and vegetable intake and risk of cardiovascular disease

“…Dietary intervention studies are time-and resource-heavy, particularly when clinical endpoints are required (47) .…”