2014
DOI: 10.1175/mwr-d-13-00303.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GSI-Based Four-Dimensional Ensemble–Variational (4DEnsVar) Data Assimilation: Formulation and Single-Resolution Experiments with Real Data for NCEP Global Forecast System

Abstract: A four-dimensional (4D) ensemble-variational data assimilation (DA) system (4DEnsVar) was developed, building upon the infrastructure of the gridpoint statistical interpolation (GSI)-based hybrid DA system. 4DEnsVar used ensemble perturbations valid at multiple time periods throughout the DA window to estimate 4D error covariances during the variational minimization, avoiding the tangent linear and adjoint of the forecast model. The formulation of its implementation in GSI was described. The performance of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
79
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Buehner et al (2010b) performed an intercomparison study for the Canadian operational global NWP model, and found that the 4DEnVar improved upon their operational, nonhybrid 4DVar in the tropics and Southern Hemisphere, but not in the Northern Hemisphere. Finally, Wang and Lei (2014) performed a comparison study of hybrid 4DEnVar with 3DEnVar using the NCEP GFS (model) at low resolution. Buehner et al (2013), again using the operational Canadian system, found that while the use of 4D instead of 3D ensemble covariances did result in small, consistent improvements in their EnVar for deterministic NWP, the gains were not as large as found when going from 3DVar to 4DVar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Buehner et al (2010b) performed an intercomparison study for the Canadian operational global NWP model, and found that the 4DEnVar improved upon their operational, nonhybrid 4DVar in the tropics and Southern Hemisphere, but not in the Northern Hemisphere. Finally, Wang and Lei (2014) performed a comparison study of hybrid 4DEnVar with 3DEnVar using the NCEP GFS (model) at low resolution. Buehner et al (2013), again using the operational Canadian system, found that while the use of 4D instead of 3D ensemble covariances did result in small, consistent improvements in their EnVar for deterministic NWP, the gains were not as large as found when going from 3DVar to 4DVar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen that improvement with hybrid experiment can be seen at all levels on taking global average, while in tropics middle levels, hybrid experiment performs inferior to 3D Var in comparison with radiosonde observations. Using NCEP/GSI system it is observed in previous studies that hybrid produced neutral or negative impact on temperature forecasts in tropics at some vertical levels in comparison with 3D Var (Wang et al 2013;Wang and Lei 2014). The improvement in wind field not seen in temperature at some vertical levels might be due to improper coupling of wind and mass fields in tropics.…”
Section: Temperaturementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Due to the nature of global observing system with large number of mass-type observations, assimilation system can anchor temperature analysis errors through assimilation of satellite radiances (Kleist and Ide 2015) and more improvement with hybrid experiment is expected in wind. It is noted in some previous studies that hybrid assimilation produced largest improvement in wind than other variables (Wang et al 2008b;Wang and Lei 2014). In this section, model wind at different pressure levels in the analysis and forecasts are compared against conventional observations assimilated in the model.…”
Section: Windmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large-scale atmospheric experiments using real observations were done later by, e.g. Buehner et al (2010b), Liu and Xiao (2013), and Wang and Lei (2014). These authors compared the results with other methods (EnKF, 3DVar, 3DVar-FGAT, Ensemble-based 3DVar, 4DVar, Hybrid 4DVar).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%