2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.4993446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth, structural, and electrical properties of germanium-on-silicon heterostructure by molecular beam epitaxy

Abstract: The growth, morphological, and electrical properties of thin-film Ge grown by molecular beam epitaxy on Si using a two-step growth process were investigated. High-resolution x-ray diffraction analysis demonstrated ∼0.10% tensile-strained Ge epilayer, owing to the thermal expansion coefficient mismatch between Ge and Si, and negligible epilayer lattice tilt. Micro-Raman spectroscopic analysis corroborated the strain-state of the Ge thin-film. Cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy revealed the formati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the 2× and 4× increase in bulk electron and hole mobilities compared to Si, as well as Ge's narrow bandgap, has fostered rapid progress toward realizing ultra-low power transistors using Ge. Motivated by the possibility of integrating Ge electronic devices with Si, as along with Ge-based light emission sources for communications, several approaches have been implemented to create a direct or quasi-direct bandgap Ge, namely: (i) tensile strained Ge as-deposited on Si [22] induced via thermal expansion coefficient mismatch; (ii) tin alloying with Ge [14,16,[23][24][25][26][27]; (iii) flexible Ge membranes [31][32][33]; and (iv), III-V compound semiconductor-based strain templates underneath the Ge layer [5,[34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. These methods have been shown to enhance the optical emission from Ge, wherein both electrically-and optically-pumped lasing from Ge [25][26][27][28][42][43][44] have been demonstrated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the 2× and 4× increase in bulk electron and hole mobilities compared to Si, as well as Ge's narrow bandgap, has fostered rapid progress toward realizing ultra-low power transistors using Ge. Motivated by the possibility of integrating Ge electronic devices with Si, as along with Ge-based light emission sources for communications, several approaches have been implemented to create a direct or quasi-direct bandgap Ge, namely: (i) tensile strained Ge as-deposited on Si [22] induced via thermal expansion coefficient mismatch; (ii) tin alloying with Ge [14,16,[23][24][25][26][27]; (iii) flexible Ge membranes [31][32][33]; and (iv), III-V compound semiconductor-based strain templates underneath the Ge layer [5,[34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. These methods have been shown to enhance the optical emission from Ge, wherein both electrically-and optically-pumped lasing from Ge [25][26][27][28][42][43][44] have been demonstrated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The future TS-Ge-QD based lasers are expected to show superior performance over the current GeSn thin film or quantum well lasers, for the following reasons. First, as the active region, the TS-Ge-QDs can be grown at the optimal temperatures of Ge leading to very high crystalline quality with minimum point defects. , This is unlike GeSn that requires a low growth temperature in order to obtain high enough Sn concentration without segregation. Second, both TS-Ge-QD and GeSn have to be monolithically grown on strain-relaxed template layers with pre-existing defects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface roughening of the Ge(001) surface during graphene nanoribbon synthesis has been previously reported 22 and can potentially affect the carrier mobility of nanoribbons on Ge by increasing surface scattering. 71 Therefore, we next study the impact of nanoribbon synthesis on the surface roughness of Ge/Si(001) and Ge(001). We find that the roughness depends on (1) the density of the nanoribbons and (2) the length of the nanoribbons.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%