2003
DOI: 10.2737/rmrs-rp-42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth of lodgepole pine stands and its relation to mountain pine beetle susceptibility

Abstract: You may order additional copies of this publication by sending your mailing information in label form through one of the following media. Please specify the publication title and series number.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The logistic regression modeling indicated a high likelihood of infestation with a lodgepole pine basal area as low as 2 m 2 /ha. Studies have suggested that stands thinned to a basal area of 27.5 m 2 /ha in pure lodgepole pine forests exhibit reduced susceptibility to mountain pine beetle (Mata et al, 2003). The resulting logistic model is indicative of the magnitude of the outbreak, where essentially all stands with suitable diameter classes are exhibiting high levels of tree mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The logistic regression modeling indicated a high likelihood of infestation with a lodgepole pine basal area as low as 2 m 2 /ha. Studies have suggested that stands thinned to a basal area of 27.5 m 2 /ha in pure lodgepole pine forests exhibit reduced susceptibility to mountain pine beetle (Mata et al, 2003). The resulting logistic model is indicative of the magnitude of the outbreak, where essentially all stands with suitable diameter classes are exhibiting high levels of tree mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These authors describe a unique relationship that has not been reported elsewhere. Mata et al (2003) determined periodic diameter and basal area growth for lodgepole pine stands thinned to varying growing stock levels (GSL) at five locations in Colorado and Wyoming. In general, diameter growth in thinned plots was significantly greater than untreated controls.…”
Section: Lodgepole Pine Forestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results indicated that although MPB prefers ponderosa pine, both species are susceptible to attack and can experience extensive mortality. An examination of tree growth and stand susceptibility to MPB in partial cut lodgepole pine stands in northern Colorado and southern Wyoming suggested a basal area of 27.5 m 2 /ha as a threshold for infestation when trees of suitable size are available [38]. A study conducted in unmanaged stands in Colorado indicated that the probability of lodgepole pine stand infestation increased when basal area was >13.6 m 2 /ha and that higher mortality levels occurred when lodgepole pine basal area was >24.4 m 2 /ha [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 1970s and 1980s, a series of plots were established in lodgepole pine stands 60-70 years-old to measure the effect of stand density on tree growth and susceptibility to MPB (Mata et al 2003) [38]. Plots were thinned using the concept of growing stock level (GSL) [38,51]. GSL quantifies the relationship between residual basal area and mean stand diameter but has been infrequently used to characterize stocking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%