1983
DOI: 10.1016/0044-8486(83)90309-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth morphology of the filtering apparatus of silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
15
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, we have to emphasize that we used relatively large fish in our study (see Table I). The food selectivity and feeding habits of smaller bigheaded carps may be different than those of the older and bigger individuals, as the morphology and mesh-size of gill rakers undergo some changes as the fish grows (Jirásek et al, 1981;Hampl et al, 1983). A good example for this is that all bigheaded carps start feeding on zooplankton after hatching and then switch to a mixed (phytoplankton and zooplankton) or phytoplankton-based diet as the ontogeny proceeds (Kolar et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Accordingly, we have to emphasize that we used relatively large fish in our study (see Table I). The food selectivity and feeding habits of smaller bigheaded carps may be different than those of the older and bigger individuals, as the morphology and mesh-size of gill rakers undergo some changes as the fish grows (Jirásek et al, 1981;Hampl et al, 1983). A good example for this is that all bigheaded carps start feeding on zooplankton after hatching and then switch to a mixed (phytoplankton and zooplankton) or phytoplankton-based diet as the ontogeny proceeds (Kolar et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linkage between the proportion of different planktonic size classes in the water and in the diet of fish was detectable in case of both phytoplankton and zooplankton, being more typical for the latter. Previous studies reported that silver carps can filter and consume smaller particles than bighead carp (Cremer and Smitherman, 1980;Spataru et al, 1983;Shapiro, 1985;Kolar et al, 2007), while others pointed out that silver carp are able to collect algae larger than 10 µm (Hampl et al, 1983;Smith, 1989;Vörös et al, 1997). However, similarly to Cremer and Smitherman (1980) or Xie (1999), we have also found that a smaller but still considerable fraction of the algae in the food of bigheaded carps was smaller than 10 µm, suggesting that these fish are able to filter and consume even nanoplankton.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, filtering mechanisms have been investigated only in a small number of phytoplanktivorous species (Hoogenboezem et al 1991;Sanderson et al 1991Sanderson et al , 1996Sanderson et al , 2001Goodrich et al 2000). The filter of the silver carp [Hypophthalmichthys molitrix (Valenciennes, 1844)], apparently evolved from the zooplanktivorous type of a mechanical filter, consists of gill arches being equipped with a densely packed double row of exceptionally long and fine gill rakers, leaving slits only 12-26 mm wide (Hampl et al 1983;Iwata 1986). Their outer surface is coated with a mucus-producing tissue in which numerous pores allow water to pass through the sieve (Jirasek et al 1981/82;Iwata 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diameter of Cydotella is usually smaller than 20 /ma (the majority 6-15 /an), while the length of Cryptomonas is usually smaller than 30 fan (the majority 10-20 grn). However, the distances between gill rakers of silver carp are larger than 15 /an and those of bighead larger than 30 grn (Liu, 1981;Hampl et al, 1983;Spataru et al, 1983). If the carps can only use the food particles larger than the distances between their gill rakers, Cydotella almost cannot be used by both carps,, and Cryptomonas would only be partly used by silver carp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%