2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2007.09.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth and surface passivation of near-surface InGaAs quantum wells on GaAs (110)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[23] Here, we would also like to note that InP capping layers have been shown to remain stable for several months after initial decrease in PL intensity, in both GaAs NWs and near-surface quantum wells, and therefore, the InP-capped NWs in this study are believed to remain similarly stable. [24][25][26] Figure 3b shows macro-PL spectra from Zn-doped GaAs NWs to study 1) large ensemble of NWs on plastic and 2) doped NWs that are relevant to optoelectronic device structures. The PL peak is redshifted from the peak wavelength of undoped NWs due to Zn doping.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[23] Here, we would also like to note that InP capping layers have been shown to remain stable for several months after initial decrease in PL intensity, in both GaAs NWs and near-surface quantum wells, and therefore, the InP-capped NWs in this study are believed to remain similarly stable. [24][25][26] Figure 3b shows macro-PL spectra from Zn-doped GaAs NWs to study 1) large ensemble of NWs on plastic and 2) doped NWs that are relevant to optoelectronic device structures. The PL peak is redshifted from the peak wavelength of undoped NWs due to Zn doping.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 23 ] Here, we would also like to note that InP capping layers have been shown to remain stable for several months after initial decrease in PL intensity, in both GaAs NWs and near‐surface quantum wells, and therefore, the InP‐capped NWs in this study are believed to remain similarly stable. [ 24–26 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has been previously used on near-surface quantum wells with enhancements of photoluminescence (PL) intensity up to four orders of magnitude and with good stability. [13][14][15] The passivation in this method results primarily from reduced surface recombination velocity, 16 which is over three orders of magnitude faster in GaAs NWs than in InP NWs. 6 We show that this technique is suitable for GaAs nanowires as well, with enhancements in PL reaching three orders of magnitude and with good stability.…”
Section: Strong Surface Passivation Of Gaas Nanowires With Ultrathin mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PL intensity has been observed to drop faster with phosphidization in earlier research as well. 15 Therefore, 1-3 s InP passivation is optimal for the best enhancement in PL and for a stable passivation, while phosphidization suffices when no long term stability is required. Regarding the passivation temperature, 470 C-550 C provided the strongest passivation effect, whereas the PL intensity dropped at 600 C-650 C. Since the temperatures 470 C-550 C and different passivation times resulted in nearly equally strong passivation, we conclude the method to be quite insensitive to changes in growth parameters.…”
Section: -mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GaAs has a high surface recombination velocity, and surface passivation is critical for efficient devices . Phosphide-based materials have been shown to provide robust passivation already with only a few nanometers thick layer, ,, and therefore, group III-phosphide materials are used here. Two different passivation materials are studied.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%