1985
DOI: 10.1080/00335638509383719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group decision‐making as a structurational process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
129
0
3

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 274 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
129
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We used natural team communicative data to identify roles, and we believe that this methodological practice holds promise. If team roles are constituted in interaction (Beebe & Masterson, 2003;Poole et al, 1985), then the preferable method for discovering team member roles is through direct observation of their communication. We followed this line of reasoning by using natural teams to obtain objective communicative behavioral data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We used natural team communicative data to identify roles, and we believe that this methodological practice holds promise. If team roles are constituted in interaction (Beebe & Masterson, 2003;Poole et al, 1985), then the preferable method for discovering team member roles is through direct observation of their communication. We followed this line of reasoning by using natural teams to obtain objective communicative behavioral data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2003; Poole, Seibold, & McPhee, 1985). As such, our investigation offers the following contributions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( (Poole et al 1985). This has been factored into the framework for studying GDSS and recent studies of GDSS have confirmed the importance of tasks.…”
Section: Possible Explanationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it is possible to relate some of the theoretical ideas underlying social construction models to FM conceptualisations. Consider the use of structures such as decision logics employed by group members to generate and sustain the group decision (Poole, 1985;Poole et al, 1985). Within the FM field, Rohrbaugh and colleagues posit that group members evaluate the effectiveness of Decision Conferencing workshops based on multiple competing criteria (consensual, political, rational, empirical) (McCartt & Rohrbaugh, 1989;Reagan & Rohrbaugh, 1990).…”
Section: Social Construction Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%