Ground-water data for Michigan 1988

Huffman, G.C.; Whited, C.R.

doi:10.3133/ofr89597

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 18 publications

(5 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For 2001, data were averaged using available data from 1997 to 2001. For other communities within the study area, withdrawals were estimated using data supplied by municipal suppliers and included in annual ground-water data reports prepared by the USGS from 1970 to 1990 Thompson, 1971, 1973;Huffman, 1974a-88;Huffman and Whited, 1988;1989;1991;1993) or previous studies of this area others, 1972 andRheaume, 1990).…”

Section: Hydraulic Properties and Stressesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Simulation of the ground-water-flow system in the Kalamazoo County area, Michigan

Luukkonen¹,

Blumer²,

Weaver³

et al. 2004

Scientific Investigations Report

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Location of Kalamazoo County, Michigan ……………………………………… 2. Surface-water basins and generalized spatial distribution of surficial glacial materials, Kalamazoo County, Michigan ……………………………………… 3. Example of a small seepage meter …………………………………………… 4. Generalized geologic section depicting hydrologic units in the Kalamazoo County area, Michigan …………………………………………… 5. Groundwater level measurement locations in the Kalamazoo County area, Michigan ……………………………………………………………………… 6. Initial estimate of groundwater levels, Kalamazoo County area, Michigan …… 7. Location of community water suppliers and selected lakes in Kalamazoo County, Michigan ……………………………………………………………… 8. Graph showing daily mean streamflow for selected streams in Kalamazoo County, Michigan …………………………………………………………………… 9. Map showing surface-water measurement locations in the Kalamazoo County area, Michigan ……………………………………………………………………… 10-11. Graphs showing-10. Average yearly precipitation from 1960 to 2001 for Kalamazoo County, Michigan ……………………………………………………………………… 11. Average estimated base flow by major surficial material type for streams in the Kalamazoo area, Michigan ………………………………………………… 12-20. Maps showing-12. Estimated bottom of the upper aquifer, Kalamazoo County area, Michigan …… 13. Estimated bottom of the upper confining unit ………………………………… 14. Estimated bottom of the intermediate aquifer ………………………………… 15. Estimated bottom of the lower confining unit ………………………………… 16. Estimated bottom of the lower aquifer ………………………………………… 17. Groundwater flow model boundaries ………………………………………… 18. Estimated horizontal hydraulic conductivity of the upper aquifer (model layer 1) determined by parameter estimation ………………………… 19. Estimated horizontal hydraulic conductivity of the intermediate aquifer (model layer 3) determined by parameter estimation ………………………… 20. Estimated horizontal hydraulic conductivity of the lower aquifer (model layer 5) determined by parameter estimation ………………………… 21. Graph showing observed and simulated water levels in wells for 2001, 1994, 1987, and 1966 pumping conditions, Kalamazoo County area, Michigan ………………… v 22. Map showing distribution of water-level residuals for 2001 pumping conditions, Kalamazoo County area, Michigan ………………………………………………… 35 23-27. Graphs showing-23. Observed and simulated streamflow for 2001, 1994, 1987, and 1966 pumping conditions, Kalamazoo County area, Michigan ………………………………… 36 24. Observed and simulated flow at seepage measurement sites for 2001 pumping conditions, Kalamazoo County area, Michigan ………………………………… 37 25. Sensitivity of water levels to changes in hydraulic conductivity and streambed parameters, Kalamazoo regional model ……………………………………… 38 26. Water levels in selected wells of the transient model simulation representing seasonal conditions, Kalamazoo County area, Michigan ……………………… 41 27. Water levels in selected wells of the transient model simulation representing monthly conditions, Kalamazoo County area, Michigan ……………………… 42 28-30. Maps showing-28. Difference in steady-state water levels in the upper aqu...

show abstract

Section: Hydraulic Properties and Stressesmentioning

confidence: 99%