Greening the Danes? Experience with consumption and environment policies

Abstract

Consumer-oriented environmental policies came high on the political agenda during the 1990s. Internationally, consumers were assigned a key role in environmental policies; also in Denmark, political initiatives were taken to promote sustainable consumer behaviour. In this article, the results of Danish policies related to consumption and environment are assessed by considering first, the environmental impacts of the political measures, and second, whether the policies have succeeded in addressing the dynamics behind increasing consumption. The study combines a theoretical understanding of consumption as an inseparable part of daily practices with empirical analyses of three fields of consumption: housing, transportation, and information and communication technology. It is pointed out that policies to promote sustainable consumption are successful only when technological development, economic structures, and information are all in accordance with each other, and this is the case only when sustainable consumption does not conflict with economic growth. A more fundamental critique thus concerns the failure of Danish consumer-oriented environmental policies to address consumption growth and the rising standards for “normal consumption.” Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007Consumer-oriented environmental policy, Sustainable consumption, Housing, Transport, Information and communication technology, Denmark,

Participatory systems mapping for sustainable consumption: Discussion of a method promoting systemic insights

“…The actual toolbox included other instruments like direct regulation (bans on problematic substances, tightening of building regulations) and subsidies to consumers, e.g. for insulation, but direct regulation was not promoted as a part of the win-win repertoire (Christensen et al, 2007).…”

The Role of Formal and Informal Forces in Shaping Consumption and Implications for Sustainable Society: Part II

“…As Christensen, Godskesen et al (2007) point out, in the past 20 years it has become normal for most European households to own at least one car, as well as individual telephones, computers, cameras, etc. [22]. Households now own more equipment, such as dishwashers, printers, coffee makers, etc.…”

“…Most environmental campaigns focus on the areas of energy and water consumption, while the -normal‖ consumption of all of these material items, including clothes, phones, etc. that are standard parts of our lives, are not addressed in environmental policy [22].…”

Designing for sustainability: Breakthrough or suboptimisation?

“…al. [41] Switching to a new smartphone with an OLED screen runs the risk of becoming a compartmentalised action that allows us as individual to feel as if we are "doing something for the environment" while we simultaneously avoid assessing the true environmental impact of our lifestyles. But finding ways forward in the face of environmental and other challenges must also be a matter beyond the individual's decsions to hold on to their "old" cell phones for yet another year, and instead involve also other societal actors and other societal dimensions (institutional, political, cultural, legal, economic etc.…”