1988
DOI: 10.1159/000275801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graph-Theoretical Representation of the Structure of Developmental Models

Abstract: A graph-theoretical representation of the structure of developmental models is described. The graph representation relates several aspects of models, namely, the structure of elementary changes of developmental features (in the structural graph), the conditional relationships between the features defining a developmental process (in the combinatorial graph), the ‘deep structure’ of a developmental model (in the model graph), and the surface form of the model (in the transition and path graphs). The graph repre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, in a system of production rules that describes how the child solves the balance scale task (e.g., Siegler, 1983), a specific decision rule is either part of the rule system or not. In a transformational generative model of syntactic development, the child's grammar either contains a rule to change the subject–verb position in questions or not, but it does not contain rules such as “Change the subject–verb position arbitrarily in 27% of the cases.” Put differently, the distinctions between developmentally different states of a cognitive structure occur in the form of discrete steps (see van Geert, 1987a, 1988c, for a more general account). However, the performance concerned does not change in the form of a sudden discrete leap corresponding to a state shift, but rather follows a gradual, sometimes irregular, increase (discussed later).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in a system of production rules that describes how the child solves the balance scale task (e.g., Siegler, 1983), a specific decision rule is either part of the rule system or not. In a transformational generative model of syntactic development, the child's grammar either contains a rule to change the subject–verb position in questions or not, but it does not contain rules such as “Change the subject–verb position arbitrarily in 27% of the cases.” Put differently, the distinctions between developmentally different states of a cognitive structure occur in the form of discrete steps (see van Geert, 1987a, 1988c, for a more general account). However, the performance concerned does not change in the form of a sudden discrete leap corresponding to a state shift, but rather follows a gradual, sometimes irregular, increase (discussed later).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a series of articles that I published some 20 years ago (Van Geert, 1987a, 1987b, 1987c, 1988, I argued that this is exactly what 'classical' theories of development do: they give you a recipe to cut up the developmental pie (basically by telling you how the pie is baked, but the metaphor is clearly carrying us away . .…”
Section: Cutting Up the Developmental Piementioning
confidence: 97%
“…According to the rules for gen erating retrospectively defined models of de velopment [van Geert, 1986b[van Geert, , 1987a, we should first infer the description of the ini tial state, by taking the opposite values of the variables describing the final state. Thus, the initial state will have the following character istics: the mental act takes place first, exter nally, second, with material (or materialized) objects, and third, in a complete, unabbre viated form.…”
Section: A Reconstruction O F the Stage Mode! Based On The 'Abbreviatmentioning
confidence: 99%