Changes in the photosynthetic efficiency of winter wheat in response to abiotic stress
Abbreviations:Ci -intercellular CO 2 concentration; D -drought stress; D+H -drought + heat stress; E -transpiration; Fat -Fatima 2; g s -stomatal conductance; H -heat stress; Mag -Mv Magma; PAM -pulse amplitude modulated fluorometer; Pla -Plainsman V.; P N -net assimilation rate; Φ PSII -effective quantum yield of PSII
IntroductionTemperature and drought have an extremely complex effect on the intensity of photosynthesis, as they influence numerous physiological processes, which in turn exert an effect on photosynthetic activity [1]. The optimum functioning of photosynthetic processes may depend on a number of other factors, including light intensity, CO 2 concentration, the plant's water balance, and whether the plants investigated are of the C3 or C4 type. Many factors may lead to a deterioration in photosynthetic intensity if they are not satisfactory for the plant.Various studies show that photosynthesis in wheat leaves starts to decline at temperatures between 28 and 35°C [2,3]. Heat stress during the reproductive phase may cause pollen sterility, tissue dehydration and lower CO 2 assimilation [1]. High temperatures injure the processes responsible for light gathering and light energy conversion, while increasing the level of photorespiration. The light-harvesting chlorophyllprotein complex may be irreversibly severed from the reaction centre nucleus, and the water-splitting system responsible for oxygen generation may also be
Keywords: Heat stress • Drought • Photosynthesis • Grain yield • Grain filling • Winter wheatAbstract: The assessment of heat and drought tolerance is of primary importance in breeding programmes designed to improve heat and drought tolerance in cereals. Three winter wheat varieties grown in controlled growth chambers were exposed to heat (H) and drought (D) stress singly and in combination (H+D). The combined effects of H and D stress were much more severe than those of individual treatments for both physiological and yield parameters during grain filling. The chlorophyll content, effective quantum yield of PSII, net assimilation rate, transpiration, stomatal conductance and intercellular CO 2 concentration were greatly reduced by H, D and their interaction. Grain yield decreased to a greater extent (48.3%) in Plainsman V, averaged over the stress treatments, than in Mv Magma (67.8%) and Fatima 2 (53.7%). The least decline was found in grain number, except in Plainsman V. Mv Magma tolerated heat stress better than Fatima 2. In terms of photosynthetic activity, Plainsman V showed better drought tolerance than Mv Magma. The results showed that changes in physiological properties during stress treatment are not always associated with changes in yield parameters, so a combination of methods may be needed to give a more precise picture of the stress tolerance of wheat varieties.