2004
DOI: 10.1107/s0021889804007320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grain-scale characterization of transformation textures

Abstract: Orientation relationships during the austenite-to-ferrite (-to-) phase transformation were investigated using electron back-scattered diffraction (EBSD) on a bainitic steel containing retained austenite. The steel was hot rolled within the austenite phase ®eld, but below the`no-recrystallization' temperature, to two different strains. The observed orientation relationships between the bainite and retained austenite are expressed in Rodrigues±Frank space. The exact Kurdjumov±Sachs relation was never found. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the classical orientation relationships for cubic crystals, i.e. the Bain (Bain, 1924), Kurdjumov-Sachs (Kurdjumov & Sachs, 1930), Nishiyama-Wassermann (Nishiyama, 1934;Wassermann, 1935), Pitsch (Pitsch, 1962) and Greninger-Troiano (Greninger & Troiano, 1949) relationships, have recently been identified and represented in this space and compared with experimental data obtained by EBSD techniques (Godet et al, 2004;He et al, 2005He et al, , 2006.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the classical orientation relationships for cubic crystals, i.e. the Bain (Bain, 1924), Kurdjumov-Sachs (Kurdjumov & Sachs, 1930), Nishiyama-Wassermann (Nishiyama, 1934;Wassermann, 1935), Pitsch (Pitsch, 1962) and Greninger-Troiano (Greninger & Troiano, 1949) relationships, have recently been identified and represented in this space and compared with experimental data obtained by EBSD techniques (Godet et al, 2004;He et al, 2005He et al, , 2006.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[35,36] Humbert et al [37] suggest that macroscopic sample dimensions control the selection. Wittridge and Jonas [38] attribute it to the deformation microstructure, Bate and Hutchinson [39] think that elastic interaction is the cause, whereas Bru¨ckner and Gottstein [34] also consider the crystallographic compatibility at grain boundaries and triple junctions in addition to the Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A prior 2 h annealing at 200°C allowed the martensite and austenite to be distinguished [24]. Some specimens were also characterised by EBSD [25]. They were first ground and subsequently polished with diamond paste down to 1 mm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%