Graham Ive and the methodology of construction economics

Abstract

Graham Ive's central contribution to our methodological debate was his insistence on the firm as the analytical unit. Ive argues we should reject theories if the aspect of construction we are examining does not satisfy the assumptions of a particular theoretical model. We see this in his rejection of neoclassical economic theories in the two topics discussed in this paper: the adoption of innovations in construction; and microeconomic analysis as it relates to price determination in the market for construction. The former requires studying not just participants in the building process, but also participants in the innovation process, and the latter uses post-Keynesian pricing theory where prices are set according to markup procedures and vary with costs, but not directly with demand. This is in contrast to the general equilibrium, perfectly competitive price setting of neoclassical economics. Ive and his collaborators show a way towards better research in their emphasis on theory and the insistence that for building economics the analytical units are the industry and the firm, not the project. Ive's concern is that the processes involved in organising the production of buildings should be seen as a distinctive and defining element of our analysis of the industry.

Network analysis of interconnections between theoretical concepts associated with principal–agent theory concerning construction projects

“…Incidence of keyword 'principal-agent' in selected journals(2005),Ürge-Vorsatz et al (2007),Sha (2013),Zhang et al (2016),Ströbele and Lützkendorf (2019) CIDavidson (2009),Vennström and Eriksson (2010),Van Duren et al (2015),Saini et al (2018),Saini et al (2019),Van den Berg et al (2020), Van Oorschot et al (2020 CMEBoukendour (2007),Bowen et al (2007),Ward and Chapman (2008),Yung and Lai (2008),Hossain (2009a),Tuuli et al (2010),Sha (2011), Bowen et al (2012,Ling and Tran (2012),Rose and Manley (2012),Chang (2013a),Espinoza and Morris (2013),Javed et al (2014),Fu et al (2015), De Valence andRuneson (2015), Winch (2015),Snippert et al (2015), De Biasio and Murray (2017),Liu et al (2017),Odoemena and Horita (2018),Gao and Liu (2019), Sha (2019), Zhang et al (2020b) ECAM Hsieh and Forster (2006), Eriksson and Laan (2007), Badenfelt (2008), Bemelmans et al (2012), Hughes et al (2012), Hosseinian and Carmichael (2014), Li et al (2014), Chong and Oon (2016), Adam et al (2017), Mei et al (2017), Chen et al (2019), Han et al (2019), Hasan and Jha (2019), Laryea (2019), Lee (2019), Wang and Shi (2019), Zhang et al (2020a) IJPM Ward et al (1991), Ward and Chapman (1991), Williams (1993), Ogunlana (1996), Farrell (2003), Turner and Müller (2003), Müller and Turner (2005), Yu et al (2005), Jensen et al (2006), Koch and Buser (2006), Smyth and Morris (2007), Turner et al (2008), Hossain (2009b), Hossain and Wu (2009), Huang and Chang (2009), Pinto et al (2009), Corvellec and Macheridis (2010), Hölzle (2010), Mahaney and Lederer (2010), Müller and Turner (2010), Bakker et al (2011), Kapsali (2011), Koppenjan et al (2011), Eriksson (2012), Hsu et al (2012), Ika et al (2012), Bond-Bernard et al (2013), Braun et al (2013), Chang (2013b), Chang (2013c), Flyvbjerg (2013), Ahola et al (2014), Biesenthal and Wilden (2014), Carbonara et al (2014), Floricel...…”