2014
DOI: 10.5430/ijhe.v3n2p13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graduate Students’ Perceptions of Written Feedback at a Private University in Pakistan

Abstract: Excellence in academic performance at the graduate level requires good command of writing skills. Teachers' written feedback can help students to develop their writing skills. However, several personal and contextual factors may influence feedback processes and its utilization by students. Therefore, understanding these factors is essential to improve the practice of written feedback. This study aimed to appraise the quality of written feedback in the graduate programmes and to ascertain students' perceptions … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
57
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
57
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Other important factors well-documented in the literature (Ghazal, et al, 2014;Iqbal et al, 2014;Newton, 2008) to have a strong influence on the way teachers provide feedback include institutional policies on WFB, teachers' workload, as well as the culture of the institute on the whole. Teachers' training and qualification also appear to be of significance, as cited earlier in Schartel (2012) and Newton, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Other important factors well-documented in the literature (Ghazal, et al, 2014;Iqbal et al, 2014;Newton, 2008) to have a strong influence on the way teachers provide feedback include institutional policies on WFB, teachers' workload, as well as the culture of the institute on the whole. Teachers' training and qualification also appear to be of significance, as cited earlier in Schartel (2012) and Newton, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is why WFB works best in circumstances where students have the opportunity to discuss it so that they may clear up confusions and ambiguities. If students are not given this chance, they usually look to their classmates for help (Ghazal, Gul, Hanzala, Jessop, & Tharani, 2014) who might not always be able to point them in the right direction as they might themselves be misled.…”
Section: Teachers' Perceptions Versus Students' Perceptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Når det gjelder preferanser, viser flere studier at studenter verdsetter tilbakemeldinger som er detaljerte, oppgaveorienterte, som er gitt i rimelig tid etter oppgaven ble utført og som fokuserer på både styrkene og det som kan forbedres (Carless, 2006;Ghazal, Gul, Hanzala, Jessop, & Tharani, 2014;Gibbs & Simpson, 2004;Rae & Cochrane, 2008;Straub, 1997;Weaver, 2006). Weaver (2006) finner at det er fire former for tilbakemeldinger som oppfattes som lite nyttige, nemlig kommentarer som er for generelle eller vage, som mangler veiledning, som fokuserer på det negative og som ikke er relatert til vurderingskriteriene.…”
Section: Innledningunclassified
“…Lizzio og Wilson (2008) kaller slike tilbakemeldinger utviklende tilbakemeldinger, og også i deres studie vurderes de utviklende tilbakemeldingene som mest effektive blant studentene. Det samme støttes i en rekke andre studier (Carless, 2006;Ghazal, Gul, Hanzala, Jessop & Tharani, 2014;Gipps & Simpson, 2004;Rae & Cochrane, 2008). Karakteristisk for de kommentarene som skårer best hos mine informanter, med unntak av de rosende kommentarene, er at de forklarer hva som kan gjøres bedre, og noen ganger gis det også konkrete forslag til hva eleven kan gjøre.…”
Section: Spørsmålunclassified