Government health care spending and the poor: evidence from Nigeria

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine whether or not government health care spending reduces the poor‐rich differences in health status. Specifically, it aims to assess the health status of the poor vis‐à‐vis government health spending in Nigeria.Design/methodology/approachRegression analysis was carried out using the Ordinary Least Square method of estimation while secondary data was used.FindingsIt was found that despite the increase in most components of health care spending in Nigeria, the health status of the average Nigerian and the condition of health infrastructure has not improved appreciably. Also, the poor have significantly worse health status than the non‐poor and they (the poor) are more strongly affected by public spending on health care relative to the non‐poor. Thus, the difference in impact of spending between the poor and the non‐poor could be substantial.Originality/valueThis study provides information that will help reposition policies on government spending, especially on health care, so as to enhance and improve the heath status of the poor in Nigeria, thereby reducing the poor‐rich differences in health status.

Indonesian Life Expectancy: Role of Health Infrastructure and Socio-Economic Status

“…These variables have a weak relationship with life expectancy. These results contradict some of the previous studies by Amaghionyeodiwe (2009), Allin, et al, (2010, and Kim et al (2017) that show a strong relationship between the availability of health facilities and public health status. Three indicators cause this condition, such as:…”

“…The availability of health personnel will make people more assured of access to health services needed, keeping the public health status of promotive, preventive, curative, and rehabilitative, and generally can improve the health status of the community. These results are in line with the previous study by Amaghionyeodiwe (2009), Allin, et al, (2010, Craigwell et al, (2012) and Kim et al, (2017), which shows the critical role of health personnel to improve public health status. Through the reduction of inequalities of interregional health care services.…”

“…Several previous empirical studies on health infrastructure also show contradictory results. Amaghionyeodiwe (2009) and Craigwell et al (2012) found an essential role in infrastructure investment in strengthening public health status. On the other hand, other researchers are showing that there is no significant influence of infrastructure on improving the quality of human resources.…”

Political Economy and History: Making Sense of Health Financing in Sub‐saharan Africa

“…A further analysis of annual expenditure of the health sector both at the federal and state levels shows that a substantial amount (over 80 per cent) of the total budget is used to pay for personnel costs (Amaghionyeodiwe, ) and thus leaves virtually nothing for capital development and overhead costs, including drugs and other basic inputs, into the healthcare delivery system. The public health system therefore has been characterised by the ‘os’ (out of stock) syndrome (Alubo, ; Uzochukwu and Onwujekwe, ) and leads to a situation where most people resort to self‐medication, the patent medicine dealers, which remain the main key health providers for over 80 per cent of the population that cannot afford the cost of care in the formal health system.…”

A Literature Review of Human Capital and Economic Growth

“…Adopting existing technologies, technological advancement, and catch-up processes are contributing factors to the rate of growth of an economy. Amaghionyeodiwe (2009), Chaudry and Rahman (2009), Liap, Du, Bing, and Yu (2019), Khembo and Tchereni (2013), and Akpolate (2014) have supported the notion that the growth of any economy is influenced by its level of physical and human capital. Hence, there is no country capable of achieving a sustained economic development path without a substantial investment in human capital (Kanayo, 2013).…”